Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Proposal] Van-NJ


Recommended Posts

To NJ: Corrado,Hansen, 2016 2nd and 2015 2nd

Devils get some depth with hansen and corrado to replace Larsson on d. They also get 2 2nds

To Van: Larsson

Larsson needs a change of scenery and i think he could thrive in desjardins system

Stop smoking, whatever it is that you're smoking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not that bad of a proposal bro

You're way over valuing him, for a team that could care less about him. They benched him the season opener, now he's pouting.

If they threw in another player and you took out a 2nd rounder in your proposal then it wouldn't be as bad. We could do better for those players than a Larsson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd offer Jensen+2nd+3rd

If they declined, they could take a hike. We already have an above average team.

Unless a trade could bring us back to an elite level team, we could live without giving up our prospects or 1 & 2nd rounders.

And I'm sorry but, Larsson will not get us there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they declined, they could take a hike. We already have an above average team.

Unless a trade could bring us back to an elite level team, we could live without giving up our prospects or 1 & 2nd rounders.

And I'm sorry but, Larsson will not get us there.

Larsson still has high potential. Jensen isn't as good of a prospect. You have to give to get.

And I don't see how we have an above average team.. We lost our best player and have no one to replace what he brings (match up against Thornton, Getzlaf, Kopitar, Toews and score 25 goals while doing so)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow this guy was such a highly touted prospect, what happened to him? That said, I think he still has that potential and would love to have him here.

Yeah, I was re-watching the 2013 draft the other day and there was mention (at the Seth Jones pick) about how it was "shades of a couple years ago when Larsson fell to #4."

IIRC, he was considered a top-2 pick at the 2011 draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To NJ: Corrado,Hansen, 2016 2nd and 2015 2nd

Devils get some depth with hansen and corrado to replace Larsson on d. They also get 2 2nds

To Van: Larsson

Larsson needs a change of scenery and i think he could thrive in desjardins system

I would like to get Larsson, need more depth on D.

Sbisa, 2016 2nd and Hansen?

I wish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larsson still has high potential. Jensen isn't as good of a prospect. You have to give to get.

And I don't see how we have an above average team.. We lost our best player and have no one to replace what he brings (match up against Thornton, Getzlaf, Kopitar, Toews and score 25 goals while doing so)

I absolutely LOATHE when people make these statements.

Jamie Benn also didn't have that kind of potential. Neither did Lidstrom.

The worst thing about some fo the posters on CDC is they state something like "prospect X's potential" while stating ours have NO potential or less value, for literally no reason.

Let me spin it another way.

Larsson has had multiple seasons to put it together but hasn't.

Jensen has top 6 potential and could be a regular 30 goal scorer.

Based on THAT potential, New Jersey should add in more.

See how that sounds....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jensen has top 6 potential and could be a regular 30 goal scorer.

You should probably change that figure to 20. Unless you're expecting a Phil Kessel clone or something.

Anyway I'll put up my proposal.

Corrado+ Jensen+ a 2nd for Larsson.

Since both Corrado and Larsson are Dmen. The only real thing we're giving up is Jensen. The 2nd being a wild card.

At the end of the day, in my proposal it all depends on who busts, and who booms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely LOATHE when people make these statements.

Jamie Benn also didn't have that kind of potential. Neither did Lidstrom.

The worst thing about some fo the posters on CDC is they state something like "prospect X's potential" while stating ours have NO potential or less value, for literally no reason.

Let me spin it another way.

Larsson has had multiple seasons to put it together but hasn't.

Jensen has top 6 potential and could be a regular 30 goal scorer.

Based on THAT potential, New Jersey should add in more.

See how that sounds....

If you can't see the obvious massive difference in value between Larsson and a guy like Jensen, then I don't even know what to say. Larsson had a higher ppg than Jensen last year in the AHL for crying out loud, and he's more of a two way defensemen anyways, while Jensen is strictly an offensive forward.

If you actually think Jensen has 30 goal potential then I don't even know what to say to be honest with you... Players that score 30 goals don't have a .36 ppg in the AHL.

That offer wasn't even good enough anyways. I would offer Jensen+Gaunce+2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...