NightHawkSniper Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Lol I actually enjoyed this thread, rather than everyone bitching and complaining we worked collectively and trolled the troller. Oh how the tables have turned.The real question is will the forum ban trolls, trollers if they continue making redundant threads in the future? Maybe we'll keep them? Hopefully we can trade them if they aren't performing in the future keep them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiggs50 Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Bruh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOOMUCHINTERNET Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Very poorly thought out thread but everyone trolling the op made me crack up. Actually laughed so hard my roommates came to see what was up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Ive read the title 7 times....I still dont understand what the heck he was thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Isn't it amazing how a simple fact blinds people to reality? Next will be "Markstrom and Sbisa to the Islanders for Tavares, is it possible?" thread. Markstrom, Sbisa, and a 1st for Tavares Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yes we can nucks Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 If the Canucks trade Markstrom, Sbisa if they play poorly, it's better to keep them in the PAST! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucksfollower1983 Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 I also find a bit disturbing that you propose to make these 2 people into some kind of hybrid. I would expect this Marksbisa to be the stay at home type, he is a goalfenseman after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Lord Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Listen, I'm a Time Lord, let me sort this out. Technically, we could travel forward in time and keep Sbisa Markstrom in the future. But trade him if he plays poorly now, by going back in time. So trade him now and keep him in the future, but it's not really the future if you think about it from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint because it came first. So now trade him in the future now if he plays poorly then or keep him in the future. Got it? Time a wibbly-wobbly is big ball stuff of timey-wimey. I don't actually know what I'm saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"Bull" Horvat Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 @KThakur20 has arrived to CDC everybody .. HAHA fml. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeefcakeBo Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 My workout's getting stale, I'm thinking about hiring a Chinese guy to attack me unexpectedly when I get home from work 3 or 4 times a week Best post I've seen today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agoork Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 A shakespearean tale: To trade, or not to trade, that is the question— Whether 'tis Markstom in the mind or Sbisa. The saves and slapshots of our future, Should they keep against a sea of troubles, or to the opposition, trade them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgilny896 Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Only if they play poorly. On the other hand, you can always keep him in the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Alright, let start a pool/thread for every player asking if they will be traded! I call the Sedins, who's getting Burrows, Kassian, Miller, Bonino, Horvat, etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apricot Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, I love all of you guys :lol: :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 So Markstrom got waived. Nobody wanted him.Now if he gets worse, people will want to trade for him?Thanks OP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amish Rake Fighter Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 I hope whoever solves the riddle gets a treasure map or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Markstrom wasn't even picked up on waivers, despite Winnipeg trading for a backup, after he was waived. Safe to say he has no value. Sbisa also has a pretty low value, considering how he's been shuffled around so much already by teams. Might've been ruined by a 'too early' start to his NHL career, but he may not ever put it together. At this point the Canucks are best served getting these project players developed as much as possible. I think they'll both be retained as RFA's in the summer. Prob. 1yr terms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Really. You just sign in and already you have two threads going (and dreadful one's at that)? OK guys...what are the odds this troll is banned within the next hour. I say 2-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Doctor Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Use one of these and you will find out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yes we can nucks Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Really. You just sign in and already you have two threads going (and dreadful one's at that)? OK guys...what are the odds this troll is banned within the next hour. I say 2-1 LOL. It's a wonder this thread has been allowed to run this long already! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.