canuktravella Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 nyquist and dekeyser for hamhuis and kassian bogosian for hansen jensen and markstrom richardson and weber for a 3rd and 5th habs sedin sedin vrbata higgins bonino nyquist burrows horvat vey dorsett gaunce mattias edler tanev sbisa bieska dekeyser bogosian stanton corrado plus shinkaruk virtanen cassels mccann pedan hutton subban tryamkin all push for spots next few yrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_V_18 Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Imagine you were the Jets right now. Would you trade your potential top 2 d-man for an unproven netminder, a b level prospect, and a 3rd/4th liner? And if you were Detroit, would you trade away 2 of your future young guns for an ageing top 4 d-man and a 3rd liner at best in Kassian? Well, this is my first post, but I don't think these trades are realistic. I think it's a no brainer to say no to these trades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 is the 3rd and 5th really that important that you'd trade our center depth and bring up an unproven rookie to steady our 4th line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted November 30, 2014 Author Share Posted November 30, 2014 gaunce would at least win faceoffs which richardson seems to have a problem doing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sneezy Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 gaunce would at least win faceoffs which richardson seems to have a problem doing Well, as Willie says, until anyone does anything with any regularity, it's just all talk. Keep talking. And the trades you proposed, they're on the level of Virtanen93 trade proposals. And I believe he's been banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Montreal has an excellent bottem 6, they have no need for Richardson. and they let Weber walk when they didn't qualify him as an rfa 2 years ago, so why would they trade for either guy, let alone both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 I like this new poster. So will you, Warhippy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 I was wondering when Hamhuis would start being included in the nonsense trades.Apparently 3 games after his mystery injury that will keep him out months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Imagine you were the Jets right now. Would you trade your potential top 2 d-man for an unproven netminder, a b level prospect, and a 3rd/4th liner? And if you were Detroit, would you trade away 2 of your future young guns for an ageing top 4 d-man and a 3rd liner at best in Kassian? Well, this is my first post, but I don't think these trades are realistic. I think it's a no brainer to say no to these trades.Good first post... Welcome to the madhouse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_V_18 Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Good first post... Welcome to the madhouse Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 I like this new poster. So will you, Warhippy. but dude....none of those guys returning to us have any more potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Imagine you were the Jets right now. Would you trade your potential top 2 d-man for an unproven netminder, a b level prospect, and a 3rd/4th liner? And if you were Detroit, would you trade away 2 of your future young guns for an ageing top 4 d-man and a 3rd liner at best in Kassian? Well, this is my first post, but I don't think these trades are realistic. I think it's a no brainer to say no to these trades.welcome to CDC. He posts this crap every week. Your response was perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_V_18 Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 welcome to CDC. He posts this crap every week. Your response was perfect. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 The Detroit one is absolutely ludicrous. Holland says no. As for the Jets, also ludicrous. Chevy says no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 Imagine you were the Jets right now. Would you trade your potential top 2 d-man for an unproven netminder, a b level prospect, and a 3rd/4th liner? And if you were Detroit, would you trade away 2 of your future young guns for an ageing top 4 d-man and a 3rd liner at best in Kassian? Well, this is my first post, but I don't think these trades are realistic. I think it's a no brainer to say no to these trades.wouldnt want Bogosian anyway. Guys always seems frickin injured all the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.