Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

(Proposal) Vancouver-Nashville


Recommended Posts

Nashville has too many good young defensemen. I think that they could risk trading a couple of them if we give them the right deal.

To NASH: Higgins, Sbisa, Stanton, Vey, Lack, and 2015 2nd

To VAN: Roman Josi and Ryan Ellis

I don't think that's enough to get them out of Nashville, but any more players isn't worth it IMO.

Thoughts?

EDIT: I'm really sorry for my lack of knowledge when it comes to trade value. How about something like this?

To NASH: Vey, Stanton, Sbisa and 2015 2nd

To VAN: Roman Josi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nashville has too many good young defensemen. I think that they could risk trading a couple of them if we give them the right deal.

To NASH: Higgins, Sbisa, Stanton, Vey, Lack, and 2015 2nd

To VAN: Roman Josi and Ryan Ellis

I don't think that's enough to get them out of Nashville, but any more players isn't worth it IMO.

Thoughts?

If you don't think it's enough then why not make the proposal for one of Josi or Ellis instead of both?

Also, I don't think they'd need Lack, they're set in net. They would likely prefer a prospect instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to give up quality to get quality. Vey is the only player that might interest them.

Give up quantity for quality*

So 5 roster players for 2 Roster players....? How are we going to fill in the other 2 forward positions and a backup? Not really thinking were you?

Josi sure we can replace Sbisa but really do we need Ellis? OP needs to lay off the drugs before posting on CDC proposal/Arm Chair GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you start off a proposal saying one team has too much of one thing, don't offer them an equal (or more) quantity of that same thing in return. If they're giving us two defencemen because they have too many, then why would they want two of ours?

Also, as has been said, giving them more players of lesser quality than what you hope for in return doesn't equal the value. You can't just hope they take two top 9 forwards, two bottom pairing (at best top 4) defencemen, a currently backup goalie and a 2nd round pick for two of their top 4 defencemen (Josi plays 3 less seconds per game than Weber, and Ellis is 3rd in TOI at 19:31 per game).

And I haven't even checked on the cap implications...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give up quantity for quality*

So 5 roster players for 2 Roster players....? How are we going to fill in the other 2 forward positions and a backup? Not really thinking were you?

Josi sure we can replace Sbisa but really do we need Ellis? OP needs to lay off the drugs before posting on CDC proposal/Arm Chair GM.

Would you trade Hamhuis and Edler for Bortuzzo, Scuderi, Comeau, Sutter and a 2nd?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give up quantity for quality*

So 5 roster players for 2 Roster players....? How are we going to fill in the other 2 forward positions and a backup? Not really thinking were you?

Josi sure we can replace Sbisa but really do we need Ellis? OP needs to lay off the drugs before posting on CDC proposal/Arm Chair GM.

Because it's clear you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...