Skirbs11 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Small Proposal at the deadline try and cash in on a few pieces #1 To Vancouver- Evander Kane To Winnipeg- Higgins, Kassian, 3rd round pick Kanes stock is thought to be at a lower value than times before, Adds young strong winger into our top 6. Gives Winnipeg another younger winger who needs a change of scenery as well as an established veteran winger for the playoffs and a Pick in a deep draft #2 To Vancouver- 4th Round pick To Any Willing Trade partner- Yannick Weber Could be a depth pick up for a playoff team, Helps us by relieving a bit more cap to fit Kane into the lineup also Gives us a 4th to make up for the 3rd we lost #3 To Vancouver-2nd or 3rd round pick To- Any Willing Trade Partner- Eddie lack or Jacob Markstrom I think the deadline would be a good chance to unload one of these goalies. Arizona was able to get a 3rd round pick for Devan Dubnyk. I think both goalies will be able to fetch a 3rd but if we find the right team could possibly snag a 2nd rounder. I would prefer to trade Lack first as markstrom is younger, Bigger, and more potential IMO #4 To Vancouver-Antoine Vermette To Arizona- Luca Sbisa,Brendan Gaunce, 2nd round pick Reunites Vermette and Vrbata on the Canucks and adds more depth to our top 6. Arizona is rumoured to be wanting a 1st rounder and a young prospect, Gaunce being the prospect and a 2nd in a deep draft and Sbisa might offset the 1st rounder Bit of a stretch but worth a shot IMO Healthy Line Up Sedin-Sedin-Kane Vrbata-Vermette-Bonino Burrows-Vey-Matthais Hansen-Horvat-Dorsett Kenins-Richardson Edler-Tanev Hamhuis-Bieksa Stanton-Clendenning Corrado Miller Lack/Markstrom Flame Away!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desiboynux4lifee******* Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 lol sorry. It was too tempting, but your trades are very unrealistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ro0 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Not interested in picking up Vermette in the slightest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken kaniff Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Winnipeg laughs. Another team will pay more for him than that for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyhee Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 #1-I agree with Ken Kaniff that somebody would offer Winnipeg more. I also think Vancouver shouldn't enter the Kane sweepstakes at all for character reasons-don't want somebody whose teammates have had it with him and who figures it's up to him to decide whether to get on the team bus and play-not to mention his past character issues. (I'm not one of those that objected to or took much inference from the picture of Kane with cash, though.) #2 and #3 seem realistic. It would be nice to find a package for a prospect who could become a scoring forward, but the picks are probably a more realistic option. #4 With Canucks management having clearly stated they aren't going to move picks or prospects for immediate help, I can't understand why this proposal is suggested. Quite aside from the statements of Canucks management, the Canucks are an old team really weak in good players and prospects in their early to mid 20's, so giving up a 2nd round pick and a forward prospect for yet another player to add to their eight players in their 30's appears to add to the age they already have while taking away the youth they'll need for the future. imo this would be contrary to the Canucks interests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 paying to much for vermette and kane I would wait till offseason less we can get him sooner and with how things are most teams will not want to trade for kane but coming here he will be very motivated to play well for friends and family! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.