Bissurnette Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 Big fan of eddie lack but I think he's the one to go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 mmm well 3 good goalies means one will be gone hopefully we get a second rounder for one of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAY JAY Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 It doesn't matter if you like Miller or not, we needed a tender of his quality. I like the attitude of Lack but he is not ready to be a #1 anywhere. I think Markstrom is the hungrier of the two (re:Lack) and is a future #1. Eddie is the perfect backup, and I think he will be gone unless Benning gets an offer for Markstrom that is just too hard to refuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxVerstappen33 Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 miller to san jose.... I wiiiiiish. Sharks are done with Niemi. Its a natural trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Buzzsaw* Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 I don't want to see Lack traded... he is going to be a #1. Miller is not going to be here forever, and Markstrom is just too flaky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbark95 Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 Markstrom has been touted as the next Ben Bishop. A tall late bloomer that is hitting his stride in the AHL. Only problem is, he is hitting his stride in the AHL. How that translates to the NHL is still up for debate. I say keep Miller/Lack together. Deal Markstrom for assets. When the Miller contract expires, have Lack/Demko as our pair with Demko being the goalie of the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mcfly Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 I don't really care, they are all good. Don't give a crap how likeable they are. Ha. Come on. Always nicer when the guys you are cheering for are likable to some degree. It only adds to the admiration of their ability as an athlete when they are humble and are able to interact with fans in a positive way. But you know...Have fun cheering for your jerseys and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 If a deal is cut in season: Miller Niemi, pick/prospect Makes more sense to move Miller at the draft though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S N Y P E R S 7 Posted February 15, 2015 Author Share Posted February 15, 2015 We need to make the goalie move before the deadline; if a team feels like they need a strong guy in the back end for the playoffs, they'll be willing to wheel and deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoosh Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 I don't think the management have seen enough from anyone to trade anyone of them. Miller is safe for sure. JB and TL didn't sign him for 1/2 season. They wan't to see it through a bit more. Läck has also been good enough to still be the potential #1 goalie. Or at least he hasn't played himself out of that slot by any means. Same goes for Markström in the AHL. Markström still needs to translate that into the NHL - again. So I don't think there will be a goalie moved at the deadline unless someone really, really want's to overpay for Eddie. Jacob still doesn't have the trade value vs the potential he has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William_Clarkson Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 If I got to choose I'd move Lack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 You say the time's a'tickin' Well you'd best listen to me, Jack For once the Botch is golden For advocating Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duc_evo Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 I think it's not a big deal. Miller could be signed until he is 37-40 years old. With that being said, Lack and Markstorm could be used to increase our prospect pool over the next couple of years like Schneider for Horvat deal. If Benning were really smart, he would trade our back ups for the height of their values to help our team in the long run. Demko will probably be our future #1 goalie after Miller retires so I'm not to concerned about this " Goalie situation." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boninorama Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 Sad to see but I think Lack will be dealt (( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S N Y P E R S 7 Posted February 15, 2015 Author Share Posted February 15, 2015 You say the time's a'tickin' Well you'd best listen to me, Jack For once the Botch is golden For advocating Lack But once he hits the sack There's no goin' back So let's pick up the slack And trade Eddie Lack Don't look at me that way We're talkin' bout Markstrom He hasn't had his day So I'm lettin' Botch say "keep him" At the end of the day There's nothing left to say. Lack is our back-up, And it's time for him to pack up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vcrguy Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 If we're smart we trade Miller for a 3rd or a late 2nd as he's nothing but a stop gap goalie who has never had playoff success. Sadly, we have a track record of being stupid so I assume we'll trade Lack for a 2nd. That means we ride Miller out for 2 more years and then???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duc_evo Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 If we're smart we trade Miller for a 3rd or a late 2nd as he's nothing but a stop gap goalie who has never had playoff success. Sadly, we have a track record of being stupid so I assume we'll trade Lack for a 2nd. That means we ride Miller out for 2 more years and then???? Miller is still an elite goalie, our defense makes him look worse than he really is. Quick, Crawford who are good goalies would look average at best if their defensive core was average. But that is not the case. Lack for a late 1st, Markstorm for a late 1st is all we can hope for. Anymore would be a steal, but any less would be crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amish Rake Fighter Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 If we're smart we trade Miller for a 3rd or a late 2nd as he's nothing but a stop gap goalie who has never had playoff success. Sadly, we have a track record of being stupid so I assume we'll trade Lack for a 2nd. That means we ride Miller out for 2 more years and then???? laugh at your Leafs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckid1990 Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Really hope they keep lack and trade miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S N Y P E R S 7 Posted February 16, 2015 Author Share Posted February 16, 2015 Botchford says let him go, let him gooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.