messier's_elbow Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 If we can get a high 2nd rounder in 2015 for either Lack or Markstrom either one is expendable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum P I Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 I don't get it. Are these pictures of Lack supposed to sway opinions? Apperantly. I don't care who is more likeable either personally , but there is something to be said for locker room value , especially in that position. Ultimately though , I want to see a winning team on the ice , and lack is The one that makes the most sense to trade imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum P I Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Miller is still an elite goalie, our defense makes him look worse than he really is. Quick, Crawford who are good goalies would look average at best if their defensive core was average. But that is not the case. Lack for a late 1st, Markstorm for a late 1st is all we can hope for. Anymore would be a steal, but any less would be crazy. 1st round pick? Won't happen. Not a chance. Would be lucky to get a high second Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 I'd rather see Miller go and use Lack/Markstrom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdatb Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 laugh at your Leafs Lol'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S N Y P E R S 7 Posted February 18, 2015 Author Share Posted February 18, 2015 I don't see many 1st round picks moving, especially from teams with picks above 20. 2nds and 3rds are valuable assets that could be traded in packages at the deadline or on the floor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S N Y P E R S 7 Posted February 21, 2015 Author Share Posted February 21, 2015 It sounds like Markstrom has a lot going for him. Where is the most likely landing spot for Lack, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horvat Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 It sounds like Markstrom has a lot going for him. Where is the most likely landing spot for Lack, then? Florida, New Yorki, Philadelphia, San Jose, Toronto, Washington? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horvat Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Markstrom and eriksson are our future imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Markstrom and eriksson are our future imo Markstrom and Demko* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucks780 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Its gonna be sad to see Lack go, if he goes. My dogs name is Lac so its kinda funny hearing someone else call his name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S N Y P E R S 7 Posted February 24, 2015 Author Share Posted February 24, 2015 Its gonna be sad to see Lack go, if he goes. My dogs name is Lac so its kinda funny hearing someone else call his name. You named your dog after Eddie Lack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snucks Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Canuck management has to get over this forever idea that they need a so called number one goalie. Lack and Markstrum are good enough to share the job. Trade away Miller if he is still wanted. No number one just play whoever is hot. when that guy falters play the other guy. A good coach can tell who to play. Not be swayed by some team policy towards the number one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronalds.Kenins41 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Canuck management has to get over this forever idea that they need a so called number one goalie. Lack and Markstrum are good enough to share the job. Trade away Miller if he is still wanted. No number one just play whoever is hot. when that guy falters play the other guy. A good coach can tell who to play. Not be swayed by some team policy towards the number one. How well did it work with Schneider and lu? I mean goalies hate sharing the crease. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Benning will have Eriksson and Markstrom, just to throw everyone off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellosinki Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 I think there will come a point where Lack is able to take over the number 1 job. At this time, either Miller's contract has expired, or he will be traded away. Markstrom will remain the backup goaltender until he is able to prove that he is NHL worthy. I think that then they will trade Markstrom away and move onto Eriksson as the backup. Lack will have the number 1 job for many years here in Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.