desiboynux4lifee******* Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Van - Olli matta - Beau Bennet Pittsburgh - Zack Kassian - Tanev Deal makes sense because Bennet and Tanev both RFAs, and Kassian and Matta is a fair deal. I don't see Canuck's resigning Tanev, I just don't, hopefully, I'm proven wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Pittsburgh won't win the cup with trades like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desiboynux4lifee******* Posted February 20, 2015 Author Share Posted February 20, 2015 Pittsburgh won't win the cup with trades like that Um Tanev will be great for them and they get a player like Kassian to play with Malkin. Are you kidding me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Maatta's out for the rest of the season so we would do this why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desiboynux4lifee******* Posted February 20, 2015 Author Share Posted February 20, 2015 Maatta's out for the rest of the season so we would do this why? He's 20 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Tanev deal is almost done according to every source that reports on the deal. Even Benning this morning was late on Team 1040 and he said sorry for it but he was in a meeting with Tanevs agent. He's 100% confident Tanev will resign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Why dont Canucks sign tanev. Either he signs or he doesn't play. Canucks hold all the power. If another team offers a contact chunks match. Anything outrageous and Canuck get compensated with picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimp C Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Why dont Canucks sign tanev. Either he signs or he doesn't play. Canucks hold all the power. If another team offers a contact chunks match. Anything outrageous and Canuck get compensated with picks If Benning loses Tanev there is close to no chance of us making the playoffs next year. None. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Maata is one of the great young bright lights, his health willing. Don't see Pitt making that trade IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Pittsburgh won't win the cup with trades like that what are you talking about Tanev is our #2 d man Tanev >>>> Maata Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manroth19 Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 This trade is do dumb....no way ever pitty makes this trade. I'd be surprised if they did this deal tanev kassian for maata alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Pittsburgh won't win the cup with trades like that what are you talking about Tanev is our #2 d man Tanev >>>> Maata what are you talking about Tanev is our #1 d man Tanev >>>> Everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vcrguy Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 OP doesn't really know who Maata is..........no way Pitt does this deal. Kassian and Tanev for Maata is a no if I'm Pitt, forget this deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 OP doesn't really know who Maata is..........no way Pitt does this deal. Kassian and Tanev for Maata is a no if I'm Pitt, forget this deal. I doubt Maatta is better than Tanev... does he make everyone around him better too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I doubt Maatta is better than Tanev... does he make everyone around him better too? He started playing top pairing minutes and looked good at age 19. You don't deal players like those. He has too much potential to give up on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter.S-Kerouac Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 Why dont Canucks sign tanev. Either he signs or he doesn't play. Canucks hold all the power. If another team offers a contact chunks match. Anything outrageous and Canuck get compensated with picks This is kind of my thinking as well If he is offer sheeted and signs Its a 1st and a 3rd pick coming our way minimum. Really well and truly he is not a 1st pairing D and we can't really move him beside Hamhuis I mean we could but it would be pretty one dimensional. We need a RHD who can draw defenders away from Edler so there isn't a conga line standing infront of him every time he T's up a shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.