TDemko2014 Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Tanev + Higgins+ Jensen for Pitts 1st + Edm 2nd +MarincinJust wondering how the waters are on both side of this trade? Best player in the Trade is Tanev, by a country mileReally want the first offer but if............or Tanev to Tampa for 2015 1st + A prospector Tanev plus Jensen to NYR for 2015 1st + 2015 2nd + 2016 2ndAt the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 I don't think EDM wants Higgins, or Jensen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Edmonton wouldn't want Higgins. That said though your value is close. I would think Edmonton would like Lack in the package. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirbs11 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 I wouldnt want to give up on Tanev yet, If it was my choice i would like to try and move Hamhuis, He is older and a soon to be UFA with higher Salary who can most likely fetch a 1st round pick on his own Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Question: Why? Our defense is terrible without Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimp C Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 You posted this in hfboards and it was bad there, still bad here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 we have a viable team we have enough draft picks and youth in the organization why weaken the present team for uncertain future picks?? makes no sense to me at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Hi Coastal I am kind of half agreement with you on this one, but I have a question..... As neither of us will be privy to any of Tanev and Bennings contract conversations or the demands of our other players. Would this not be a good trade at the draft if Benning could not afford him for what ever reason? My understanding of Marincin, is that he will be a very viable top 4 defenseman when he fully develops. My thought is that Edmonton would want him.......other teams may Keslerize us knowing we can't meet Tanev's demands? Just saying........in saying all that, I would much rather keep Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAVA-1 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Would rather send that package to the Islanders to pry Reinhart if possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 If you are going to package Tanev do it at the draft to move up to get Provorov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Yea let's trade assets when we're second in our division. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Yea let's trade assets when we're second in our division. Lol. At the draft is after the season. Thats the best time to make a trade not the trade deadline if you want to build for the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.