Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Trade] Nathan Horton to Leafs for David Clarkson


Recommended Posts

Another interesting way to look at this from CLB's perspective..

They would have to pay a player another contract at league minimum to fill Horton's spot on the ice, maybe more.

So rather than pay the $6 mil for Horton plus another $550k for that spot ($6.55 mil) they replace it with $5.25 mil. That's a real dollar savings of $1.3 mil per, minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another interesting way to look at this from CLB's perspective..

They would have to pay a player another contract at league minimum to fill Horton's spot on the ice, maybe more.

So rather than pay the $6 mil for Horton plus another $550k for that spot ($6.55 mil) they replace it with $5.25 mil. That's a real dollar savings of $1.3 mil per, minimum.

Good point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the trade wasn't even Nonis' idea.

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 7m7 minutes ago

CBJ initiated trade proposal with TOR. They wanted to lose Horton's financial commitment for player who couldn't play. CBJ wanted Clarkson.

CBJ signs a guy to a megadeal they couldn't insure.

TO trades for him even though he clearly will not play again.

TO claims they won the trade.

I think both franchises look bad today and they should feel bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaron Portzline ‏@Aportzline 8s8 seconds ago

#CBJ did not have insurance on Nathan Horton, so they would have had to pay the full amount of his contract for the rest of his term.

All about the bucks.

And this right here is the only reason why Nonis got a get out of jail free card on one of the worst signings in recent memory. Both players have 4 more years on their deals, but if Horton wasn't going to retire and wanted to drag this out in hopes of returning, CBJ might as well have the player that could be on the ice.

Insurance companies pay injured players...

Not if they aren't insured, they don't... :sadno:

can anyone photoshop a tank with maple leafs decals all over it?

They've been floating around twitter the past couple days:

B-uQPOfWsAEo_pA.jpg

B-uB771WsAAWPd8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So....insuring a players contract against LT injury/retirement is optional for each NHL team?

Really?

The Leafs are the kinda team who would then I suppose. Way more "have" then the Jackets

Surprised that's not a league wide policy though....

Some player's injury history makes it cost prohibitive to insure them. Crosby for instance had trouble with that after his concussions (although I think that was mainly for the Olympics). To add to that, Horton was injured when CBJ signed him iirc, so that would likely have been a factor in insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Horton plays again Toronto wins.

If Horton doesn't play again, Toronto wins.

Win-win for T.O.

I agree with this, for the most part.

Great move by Nonis.

However, Columbus aphas a much better system and better players for Clarkson to play with. Perhaps he becomes a 40 point player. Still overplayed, and unlikely it will ever happen.

Surprising to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...