awalk Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 So I'm confused. How does dumping Sharp coincide with trading for Timonen? One is going for it, the other fixing their cap and trading for futures (Wilson). I LOVE Wilson, have him in two keeper pools. But Sharp >>> Wilson... Or > Johansen. Just trying to see logic behind the Black Hawk side. Seems a perfect deal for summer? Possibly temptation to get something done now when market values are ridiculous...but probably will be more smoke than fire in this case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noseforthenet Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Sharp has really nosedived from last year, if Chicago can actually get some valuable assets, wow. Sharp's getting old, i don't think this is an off-year, i mean he's only going to get worse at 33. Watch the Hawks get a top prospect and pick though They better not get Madison Bowey. I will be PISSED!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 They better not get Madison Bowey. I will be PISSED!!!! They have no room for defensemen anyway so that's unlikely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I do think that Washington sees this year as a window. They'll be All-In, me thinks. Yep. Believe this year and the next 2 years Caps will push all in. Try and win one before Ovie starts declining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsMillerTime Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 The one people Washington in my mind can give up are.... Brouwer, Mojo, Laich, Wilson. So maybe add a 1st and a 2nd from Washingtons perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noseforthenet Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 They have no room for defensemen anyway so that's unlikely.His contract can still allow him to sit in the AHL for 3 years, once he's done with the Rockets. I would bet there ends up being room for him some time before 2018. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losing With Pride Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Washington could give them Forsberg... oh wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I would put Sharp on the 2nd line - Backstrom and Ovie are gonna get theirs with or without Sharp so I would add Sharp to the 2nd line with Johansson, and move him up/load up the 1st line only when the team is trailing in the 3rd period/need to juggle to get the team going CHI will ask for Johansson but WSH shouldn't do because they need him (to play with Sharp) since Kuznetsov isn't ready for 2C role yet. If you are trading for a 33yr old that means you intend to win now, so keep the more developed center over one with more potential but just isn't there yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Washington could give them Forsberg... oh wait. Zzzzziiiiiiiing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crunchy the Tiger Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Dont Blackhawks need scoring from Sharp ? ,especially now after Kane is out . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Mark Spector @SportsnetSpec Not sure where Patrick Sharp trade angles emanate from. I am told there are NO plans by Chicago to move him by deadline. #NHLTrade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Sharp has really nosedived from last year, if Chicago can actually get some valuable assets, wow. Sharp's getting old, i don't think this is an off-year, i mean he's only going to get worse at 33. Watch the Hawks get a top prospect and pick though Sharp's good, but he's no Erat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Mark Spector @SportsnetSpec Not sure where Patrick Sharp trade angles emanate from. I am told there are NO plans by Chicago to move him by deadline. #NHLTrade Well that's that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canorth Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Well that's that. Or a sign that nobody wants to talk to Spector. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackcanuck Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Mark Lazerus @MarkLazerus 6m6 minutes ago Two sources say Patrick Sharp is in play as trade deadline nears. Sharp has a modified no-trade clause. Caps, Wings intrigued. #Blackhawks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl's Jn Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Ovechkin - Backstrom - Sharp This would instantly be one of the deadliest, if not the deadliest line in the league. A first line RW is what WSH has needed for years. Ovechkin isn't grttig any younger at 29, and Green's future in WSH isn't looking promising. If I'm Washington, I'd certainly pay up, becasue their young stars, aren't so 'young' anymore. they would be so easy to score on them but don't get caught they will be cherry picking for goals.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanIsleCanucks Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Hawks are not angling for Kessel... Toew 10.5 M Kane 10.5 M Kessel 8 M Are you kidding 29 million tied up in 3 players not gonna happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Mark Lazerus @MarkLazerus 6m6 minutes ago Two sources say Patrick Sharp is in play as trade deadline nears. Sharp has a modified no-trade clause. Caps, Wings intrigued. #Blackhawks Chris Kuc @ChrisKuc Patrick Sharp's agent, Rick Curran, spoke with GM Stan Bowman on Thursday and was assured #Blackhawks have "no intention" of trading Sharp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatsPajamas Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Hossa doesn't have an NTC does he? Why is no one talking about the Hawks moving Hossa. Without an NTC and being the better player he would fetch a better return. He is older which would hurt the return but that would also be a plus for the Hawks in that Sharp probably has more in the tank. From the standpoint of Buffalo/Edmonton I would be extremely intrigued by Hossa. They've both got a really young group that could use a veteran to lead the way on the ice, someone to take the load/pressure off their youth, and they are both primed to become contenders with the addition of McDavid or Eichel. Teams like Calgary and Florida could also be interested. Budding young teams, similar (but not as good) as Chicago was when they signed Hossa who by adding a significant player like Hossa can bump their team into contender status. Where can I see whether or not players have NTCs and what kind of NTCs they have now that cap geek is gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Doesn't make sense, so Washington would need to move out scoring in order to add scoring in Sharp ? anything Washington could move to land Sharp would have been lateral or a loss to the Caps. And never mind I see VC has posted some evidence that Sharp aint going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.