Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Someone Track Eklunds Rumours This Year


Brick Tamland

Recommended Posts

Lets see if he gets 10 percent.

Here is today

On Petry...

Chicago, Tampa, and the Wings...

On Michalek...

The Flames Tampa and Anaheim.

On Lupul....

The Bruins and Hawks

On Kadri...

Vancouver

On Grossmann...

Anaheim and Calgary

On Zuccarello...

Phoenix, Dallas, Toronto, and Calgary.

On Vermette...

Rangers and Phoenix, Boston, NYI, Winnipeg, Chicago, Montreal

On Zidlicky...

Isles

On Neuvirth...

Nashville and Rangers

On Yandle...

Rangers, Canadiens, Flyers, and Lightning..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine I'll track my own rumours in this post and see if I can beat him at his own game.

2/27

Michael Ryder… Minny, Boston, Anaheim, Wash

Torrey Mitchell….Detroit, Minny, NYR

Nicklas Grossman… Detroit, Boston, Anaheim

Tim Gleason…Boston, Anaheim, TB, Pittsburgh

Jay McClement…Detroit, Minny, TB, Wash

Joffrey Lupul… LA, Anaheim, Wash

Erik Condra….Boston, Detroit, StL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fun and this dude Brick...two things I would have never have thought would be associated. There's a first for everything.

I'll make a wager on 5%.

No need to attack his personality for defending his interesting idea from some meat that chose to make a bone headed comment. Kinda like this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, i like this idea. Lets see how legit eklund really is.

We know he's not legit, with a minimal track record of actually calling trades. But until he's deemed an invalid source there's no point in creating threads about him to complain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch him get a 100%

Watch him be wrong about everything other than naming the obvious players leaving Toronto.

We know he's not legit, with a minimal track record of actually calling trades. But until he's deemed an invalid source there's no point in creating threads about him to complain.

It's entertaining to poke fun at meat heads. Please don't rain on the parade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know he's not legit, with a minimal track record of actually calling trades. But until he's deemed an invalid source there's no point in creating threads about him to complain.

Lighten up man, if you dont want to read about eklund, go to a different topic... theres no point in posting here.

Anyways back on topic. I feel Eklund will make one correct prediction on a trade, and no more than one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lighten up man, if you dont want to read about eklund, go to a different topic... theres no point in posting here.

Anyways back on topic. I feel Eklund will make one correct prediction on a trade, and no more than one.

I read any number of Eklund topics, at least those with actual rumours.

But then, you do understand what this sub-forum is for, don't you? And what the allowed sources are?

That's right, of course you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read any number of Eklund topics, at least those with actual rumours.

But then, you do understand what this sub-forum is for, don't you? And what the allowed sources are?

That's right, of course you don't.

This is about the legitimacy of a source that provides TRADES, RUMOURS, AND SIGNINGS. Maybe you should add more substance to your post about the thread than your obsession with mini-modding every post.

As for the OP, I think he'll probably get maybe 15-25 percent right. He'll have all the Toronto ones and maybe he actually has a source in some other city!

Edit:typos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...