Lui's Knob Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Schlemko again? Maybe this time they grab him. Sending McMillan down opens a roster spot.,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Tortorella Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 My guess would be mark is okay due to actually playing for comets where mcmillian hasnt played any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I recall a few threads over the last two weeks where people have wanted Erixon. Well....if he falls that far here's our chance. Also, Not shocked about McMillan. Kind of energetic but no real improvement and as just a warm body in the lineup we'd be better served having Jensen or someone up from the Comets. Agreed that he didn't impress and there could be a good pickup option if we have room in the 23 man roster. Patrick Johnston @risingaction 22m22 minutes ago To be eligible for AHL playoffs, McMillan needs to be on Comets roster at deadline on Monday #ahl #canucks That was true with the 'clear day roster' that used to be in place but that hasn't been used since the lockout. I'm not sure if this is accurate. Does that go for Markstrom as well? Now that the 'clear day roster' is gone, teams can submit their official playoff roster in April. Since Markstrom's being playing already for the Comets there isn't any issue with him going back for playoffs. I'm not sure if they have to make a paper transaction to facilitate that, but there's no worries about waivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead44 Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Wow Erixon on waivers? JUST turned 24, ppg in the AHL last year. Huge potential still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Maybe sharp wasn't the problem ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 In the Kimmo trade some people suggested we should buy low on Erixon... Free waiver pick up? Not sure how we can get a better deal. Place a claim JB! Also Arizona gets first crank at McMillan if they want, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 You have to grab Erixon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC · 4m4 minutes ago More: Schlemko (DAL), Erixon (CHI), Zepp (PHI) No need for the 5th now, eh DeNiro? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Why did philly lose lead zepp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter.S-Kerouac Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I doubt McM gets picked up. Unless it's by a bottom feeder who needs a warm body to put in the lineup after trading someone for pix. He will be good to have in Utica as I would imagine they wont be getting Kenins back for some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockNroLLa. Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Easy come, easy go. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Erixon is interesting, but with the bodies coming back, do we make a play? And even if we do, wouldn't there be another team (EDM for one) below that should claim him also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 McMillan will clear. Spots needed for the deadline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Could make a pretty good defense core from CHI rejects. I think McMillan passes through, too much other talent to claim. McMillan was always a headscratcher anyway, completely redundant with the bottom 6 players we already have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOgRook Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Never should have picked up McMillan in the first place. Oh well, maybe he can help out Utica. And why not? Free pickup when we're injury riddled, wasn't a liability when on the ice and has more NHL experience in a3rd/4th line role than anybody we had in utica. I like willie and jbs style with the call ups. IMO bringing up Shink or Jensen to play that role isn't setting them up for success. Agree that hopefully he can help Utica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Zepp rules! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 No need for the 5th now, eh DeNiro? I've never proposed trading for Erixon... But I agree, we should definitely put in a claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombastik der Teutone Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Zepp rules! he wasnt bad ..would keep him over emery :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 In the Kimmo trade some people suggested we should buy low on Erixon... Free waiver pick up? Not sure how we can get a better deal. Place a claim JB! Also Arizona gets first crank at McMillan if they want, correct? Crack. First crack at McMillan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Crack. First crack on McMillan. Oops my bad. I'm always on Cdc from my android... So many threads too read, don't have time to review every typo lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.