Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Why I believe we need to kill the one defenseman PP


Orka

Recommended Posts

-The powerplay sets up in a diamond formation, plotting edler (or the other dman) right in the middle of the blue line, so when the puck rolls up the boards past the hashmarks, there's no one there.

-we give up countless odd man rushes, ON OUR POWERPLAY

-though Vrbata is a great shooter he goes very deep on the left side which leaves a huge gap behind him, a territory too large for our one dman to patrol.

-The sedins cycle on the opposite side of the ice of Vrbata which means a pass from daniel or henrik has to cross the area with the most traffic.

Just my thoughts, maybe I'm just frustrated watching the Arizona game...

Opinions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I totally agree with you. Its been frustrating for a while. The times we have scored since the winter break have been in the first 45 seconds of the PP without any turnovers for the most part. Definitely exposes huge gaps on the blue line for easy clearances when the PK do get the puck and make traffic difficult for the Sedin's to pass the puck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, I think the PP wont work because NOBODY WILL SHOOT THE DAMN PUCK!! We pass and pass and pass and turnover and oddman rush. Vrbata will shoot, but the Sedins never go to him. Neither of them will shoot either. It's almost infuriating to watch, especially at crucial points in the game.

Sorry, I'm mad at the Yotes game too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, I think the PP wont work because NOBODY WILL SHOOT THE DAMN PUCK!! We pass and pass and pass and turnover and oddman rush. Vrbata will shoot, but the Sedins never go to him. Neither of them will shoot either. It's almost infuriating to watch, especially at crucial points in the game.

Sorry, I'm mad at the Yotes game too.

The d-men never want to shoot either they just give it back to the Twins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1-3-1 formation has killed the momentum. They can play 4 forwards but they just need to employ the different formation such as umbrella or some kind of 2-2-1 or 2-1-2 or the combination thereof, so that if the PK get the puck, they will just simply shoot it out by the board where nobody is there because the defenceman is not there. I would employ the two players by the blue line, close to the board while the other side would be at the middle of the blue line, kind of flow back and forth. Vrbata can play on the point and he has a better shot than Edler or anybody on the point.

I think that the Canucks has been using 1-3-1 for a long time and it is time for them to use different formation and all they need to find the right type of formation to their strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that this is an issue.

The Canucks PP is actually letting the team down. Tonight was another good example. The Sharks game, with the 5-on-3 is another good example - that PP could have shifted the game's momentum.

I'd like to see a PP with Burrows in front of the net, the Sedins dealing (Henrik) and Daniel (shooting), and with 2 D on the points.

Time to get back to basics!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...