Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Discussion] A look at our team vs. other teams' back end PMD situation


Recommended Posts

The guys I've included in this list are either known entities as PP QB, PMD or have near or are above 0.5 p.p.g. this season from the back end. Aside from some of the bottom-feeding teams (Edmonton, Toronto, Buffalo) and New Jersey, we're the only team (the only team in the playoffs right now for sure) to not have a defenseman score over 1/2 p.p.g.! At the current pace, none of the defensemen on our roster are on pace to score more than 25 points!

Anaheim: Vatanen, Lindholm, Fowler, Wisniewski
Arizona: OEL
Boston: Hamilton, Krug
Buffalo: --
Calgary: Giordano, Brodie, Wideman
Carolina: Faulk
Chicago: Keith, Timonen?
Colorado: Barrie, E. Johnson
Columbus: J. Johnson, Savard
Dallas: Klingberg, Daley, Goligoski
Detroit: Kronwall, Zidlicky?
Edmonton: (would you count Schultz? I'm undecided but he's got potential)
Florida: Ekblad, Campbell
LA: Doughty, (Sekera)
Minnesota: Suter
Montreal: Subban, Markov
Nashville: Josi, Franson, Ellis, Weber, Jones (whoever faces them in the playoffs... :frantic: )
Jersey: (Larsson could be coming on)
Rangers: Yandle, Boyle?
Islanders: Leddy, Boychuk (Johnny's here because he's scoring at above 1/2 p.p.g).
Ottawa: Karlsson
Philly: Streit, Del Zotto
Pittsburgh: Letang
San Jose: Burns
St. Louis: Shattenkirk, Pietrangelo
Tampa: Hedman, Stralman
Toronto: (Rielly/ Phaneuf?)
Vancouver: no pure offensive D; Edler's two-way, and Weber/ Clendening aren't
Washington: Carlson, Green
Winnipeg: Byfuglien, maybe Enstrom/ Myers too

As most of you have likely observed, the back end of this team is an issue.

Without guys who are capable of completing stretch passes (as witnessed in the S.J. game, for instance), there's a gap between our team and others in terms of the ability to generate consistent offense, if the transition from the back to the forwards can't be completed regularly. That would be like an army without a proper supply line-- the offensives would be more difficult to facilitate.

Thoughts? I really hope Trader Jim does something about it in the off-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guys I've included in this list are either known entities as PP QB, PMD or have near or are above 0.5 p.p.g. this season from the back end. Aside from some of the bottom-feeding teams (Edmonton, Toronto, Buffalo) and New Jersey, we're the only team (the only team in the playoffs right now for sure) to not have a defenseman score over 1/2 p.p.g.! At the current pace, none of the defensemen on our roster are on pace to score more than 25 points!

Anaheim: Vatanen, Lindholm, Fowler, Wisniewski

Arizona: OEL

Boston: Hamilton, Krug

Buffalo: --

Calgary: Giordano, Brodie, Wideman

Carolina: Faulk

Chicago: Keith, Timonen?

Colorado: Barrie, E. Johnson

Columbus: J. Johnson, Savard

Dallas: Klingberg, Daley, Goligoski

Detroit: Kronwall, Zidlicky?

Edmonton: (would you count Schultz? I'm undecided but he's got potential)

Florida: Ekblad, Campbell

LA: Doughty, (Sekera)

Minnesota: Suter

Montreal: Subban, Markov

Nashville: Josi, Franson, Ellis

Jersey: (Larsson could be coming on)

Islanders: Yandle, Boyle?

Rangers: Leddy, Boychuk (Johnny's here because he's scoring at above 1/2 p.p.g).

Ottawa: Karlsson

Philly: Streit, Del Zotto

Pittsburgh: Letang

San Jose: Burns

St. Louis: Shattenkirk, Pietrangelo

Tampa: Hedman, Stralman

Toronto: (Rielly/ Phaneuf?)

Vancouver: no pure offensive D; Edler's two-way, and Weber/ Clendening aren't

Washington: Carlson, Green

Winnipeg: Byfuglien, maybe Enstrom/ Myers too

As most of you have likely observed, the back end of this team is an issue.

Without guys who are capable of completing stretch passes (as witnessed in the S.J. game, for instance), there's a gap between our team and others in terms of the ability to generate consistent offense, if the transition from the back to the forwards can't be completed regularly. That would be like an army without a proper supply line-- the offensives would be more difficult to facilitate.

Thoughts? I really hope Trader Jim does something about it in the off-season.

Clendenning can make long passes and it's not his faults the forwards can't receive them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our back end has scored consistently less than even Edmontons since about mid November.

This is not new news.

Many of us have been moaning about the lack of a true PMD or pure offensive talent on the back end since 2012.

It is what it is. I worry more about our blueline keeping pucks out of OUR net right now than putting pucks in another

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our back end has scored consistently less than even Edmontons since about mid November.

This is not new news.

Many of us have been moaning about the lack of a true PMD or pure offensive talent on the back end since 2012.

It is what it is. I worry more about our blue-line keeping pucks out of OUR net right now than putting pucks in another

Of course it's not news, but just because it's been the case for awhile doesn't make it any less of an issue.

I tend to look at it as, if the passes could connect better, that even if it doesn't result in the puck going into the other team's net, then at least it would result in fewer turnovers in risky areas. You'd rarely see someone like Duncan Keith or Erik Karlsson, with the speed to drive defenders back and the passing skills to keep defenders honest, turn the puck over from the back end near their own zone like the team has been over the past couple of games, and if the breakouts are successful then that would also negate the risk of odd-man rushes and scoring chances coming back our way (unless that was Willie's way of trying to market Eddie as a #1?!). I'd think of it as two birds (offensive efficiency improved, defense less burdened because the forwards are making things happen) with one stone.

For people saying Clendening, Tanev or Corrado, I'd agree that they can make passes normally, but they're not the facilitator from the back end that would have a major impact night in, night out in transition. Without strong passers from the back end the five-man skater unit won't really be able to work as a unit in moving the puck up ice, as it would be the same as having a gap in the back end between the goalie and forwards-- breakouts would be that much more difficult to complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...