Toews Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 8 hours ago, Boudrias said: I believe the 2nd rounder from Columbus is discretionary on their part. Their choice between 2016 & 2017 & 2018. I doubt they give up for this year. Perhaps Benning trades the pick for something this year. 23 hours ago, missioncanucksfan said: So how has Toronto been doing it all year? Buffalo the year before? Have you seen their rosters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 4 points out off the bottom 3. Bottom 3 is not out of the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 I'm pretty torn on players from the 6-10 range. I don't really think any of them are what this team needs. But saying that I think Serachyov, Juolevi and Gauthier should be your primary targets. Gauthier has the lowest floor but also that highest ceiling, if his offence doens't come along he is a 3rd liner, if he hits then he will be 30 goal scorer. I believe that Gauthiers ceilling is higher than Virtanens but he also has a much high chance of not reaching that ceiling IMO Dubios isn't going to produce enough to be a 1st liner and is most likely a 2nd liner or 3rd line winger. Mcleod is fast but I think thats about it with him, he will need to let the rest of his game to catch up to his speed otherwise he's a 2nd/3rd liner Alex Nylander is interesting because he is a more gritty version of his brother yet the skill set is about the same. I won't mind drafting him at all. I think he is going to be the next guy up after that group of 5 is taken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiggs50 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Tank tank and tank some more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedman Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 On 2016-02-27 at 3:46 AM, R3aL said: Of course I'll be ecstatic if we win lotto 1, 2 or 3 and get Matthews or a fin. But I'll be very happy if we draft between 5-8 and take one of: chychrun nylander tkachuk juolevi sergachyov Pretty much this. There are obviously players you prefer over others, but it would be hard to be angry if we ended up with either of these. Could possibly add Dubois to that group, though im not valuing him as high as those guys as of now, especially considering our positional need that is defence. I consider both Tkachuk and Nylander as better offensive prospects than Dubois. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87Crosby Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 I see Tkathuk or Chrychun slipping to 5. I have the big three followed by Dubois and then it's all up to the teams. If we pick between 5-8 I want to see us grab Tkachuk, Sergachev, Juolevi, Nylander and Chrychun in that order. Maybe try to get an extra mid to late first and pick up Bean if we don't pick a d man. Really love his creativity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 I cant see Chychurn falling below where ever Edmonton picks. Winnipeg is another team that needs left handed D. Out of the Top 5, I see Tkachuk the most likely to fall out of the top. I think Nylander could slip into the 5 spot and maybe Dubois at 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnipeshow91 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 13 minutes ago, Gstank29 said: I cant see Chychurn falling below where ever Edmonton picks. Winnipeg is another team that needs left handed D. Out of the Top 5, I see Tkachuk the most likely to fall out of the top. I think Nylander could slip into the 5 spot and maybe Dubois at 6 Dubois at 6? I think he is slightly overrated, should be in the 10ish range Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Chycrun mr. 17 points in his last 17 games, will probably end up being the 4th pick, with his late season surge. Dude now is just 5 points behind Doughty with the same amount of games, on a weaker team. true stud. Quote IMO Dubios isn't going to produce enough to be a 1st liner and is most likely a 2nd liner or 3rd line winger. dudes got 87 points in 57 games... 19 points ahead of the next guy on his team...... his offence is generated through tenecious hard work... I choose him ahead of Nylander. Quote Dubois at 6? I think he is slightly overrated, should be in the 10ish range love his work ethic. Dude never quits type of player. some on hfboards.com were comparing him to Sean Monahan. but a "harder worker" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messier's_elbow Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 12 hours ago, Gstank29 said: I'm pretty torn on players from the 6-10 range. I don't really think any of them are what this team needs. But saying that I think Serachyov, Juolevi and Gauthier should be your primary targets. Gauthier has the lowest floor but also that highest ceiling, if his offence doens't come along he is a 3rd liner, if he hits then he will be 30 goal scorer. I believe that Gauthiers ceilling is higher than Virtanens but he also has a much high chance of not reaching that ceiling IMO Dubios isn't going to produce enough to be a 1st liner and is most likely a 2nd liner or 3rd line winger. Mcleod is fast but I think thats about it with him, he will need to let the rest of his game to catch up to his speed otherwise he's a 2nd/3rd liner Alex Nylander is interesting because he is a more gritty version of his brother yet the skill set is about the same. I won't mind drafting him at all. I think he is going to be the next guy up after that group of 5 is taken I still think we end up with Juolevi. Benning will like the program that is developing him in London. Plus he's exactly what this team is lacking. A general on the back end. Plus he's not small at all he just needs to add weight. I like Sergachov as well but I think Juolevi is the safest pick to be a top 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messier's_elbow Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Hey everyone is grumpy from from the lack of trades but we are close to a lottery pick. Even if we don't win the lotto there are lots of studs in the top 10 this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckMan10 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 I'm curious to see what Scott Conway could do if we drafted him with a 7th rounder. Undrafted in 2013 because he was in the NAHL. +1 year over ppg in the USHL. +2 year solid numbers in university. +3 leaves college to go to the bchl and is lighting it up over 2 ppg (not so special because he's old) but maybe he was just a late bloomer andcould work his way up through the echl. Would we even need to spend a pick on him or could we just sign him to a minor contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 There a guy on the HF board, seem well connected that says that some team will pass on Sergachyov all together because they don't like him. He also said that there are some people that love Bean and some that will pass on him. So that kind of sounds like Sergachyov has a good chance of falling out of the top 10. Most scouts have Bean in the 15 range and there are some teams that don't like him so he could fall as well. If he does fall to the bottom of the first I bet you Benning trades up to draft him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Just now, Gstank29 said: There a guy on the HF board, seem well connected that says that some team will pass on Sergachyov all together because they don't like him. He also said that there are some people that love Bean and some that will pass on him. So that kind of sounds like Sergachyov has a good chance of falling out of the top 10. Most scouts have Bean in the 15 range and there are some teams that don't like him so he could fall as well. If he does fall to the bottom of the first I bet you Benning trades up to draft him. You know, anything that causes Sergachyov to land in our lap is great, but that is some awfully flimsy evidence you're basing this entire assumption on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Its Sergachev guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Just now, Gooseberries said: Its Sergachev guys. That's what I deserve for copy and pasting to save time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Double post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 1 minute ago, Winter Soldier said: That's what I deserve for copy and pasting to save time. The funny thing is it all started from a mock draft website. Shows you how "informed" some of these members are lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 19 minutes ago, Gooseberries said: Its Sergachev guys. I think Sergachyov is the Russian spelling, like Evgeni is often spelled Yevgeni. It think that Sergachev is the anglicized spelling, but Sergachyov is the phonetic spelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 13 minutes ago, Diamonds said: I think Sergachyov is the Russian spelling, like Evgeni is often spelled Yevgeni. It think that Sergachev is the anglicized spelling, but Sergachyov is the phonetic spelling. Good find. Still though its on the back of his jersey. We'll spell it like so. Agreed? Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.