Off_The_Schneid! Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 9 hours ago, Rush17 said: Nylander - Matthews - Marner eek looks pretty dope too me lol. I'd take Lion-eh if thats the case :D Sedin - Sedin - Hansen Baertschi - Horvat - Laine Etem - Sutter - Virtanen Zalewski - Gaunce - Greiner Edler - Tanev Hutton - Tryamkin Sbisa - Larrsen I can really see Horvat Laine being dominent. I like the idea of matthews but i still feel horvat will be a good #1 center. Matthews be ez decision but ya lol. Some believes Laine could be taken over Matthews but its hard for a time to pass on the strong center. I personally think that laine would be better off with a more dynamic center horvat is more of a straightforward create of fence off the rush and is getting groomed to become a shutdown center laine should play with mccann to get groomed as a future top line sedin Sedin sutter Baertshi Horvat virtanen Rodin mccann laine dorset granlund Hansen etem with hansen and virtanen switching lines interchangeabley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chickenman92 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 I have s feeling the Canucks get leapfrogged and end up picking 4th. If I'm picking fourth, I'm taking Tkachuk and I could see Beijing doing the same thing - real meat n potatoes guy with a 200 ft game and grit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.Am.Ironman Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 The simulator just gave me the ideal scenario: Vancouver, Arizona, WPG See if Arizona puts a package together for Matthews and the Canucks walk away with Laine +. WPG also gets an elite player which relegates EDM, TOR, CGY lower in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 17 minutes ago, chickenman92 said: I have s feeling the Canucks get leapfrogged and end up picking 4th. If I'm picking fourth, I'm taking Tkachuk and I could see Beijing doing the same thing - real meat n potatoes guy with a 200 ft game and grit. I agree here. Tkachuk is going to be a very valuable playoff piece. He would fit in seamlessly with the kind of forward group thats currently being assembled. Tkachuk - Horvat - Boeser in 2-3 years has potential to become dominant in many ways. I like where we are headed, but its going to take a bit more time. Only fast tracking here is getting Matty or a Finn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K PureCool Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 All I can say is that April 30th can't come fast enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleksander Barkov Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 41 minutes ago, 24K PureCool said: All I can say is that April 30th can't come fast enough. April 30th is my birthday! My only birthday wish is for the Canucks to win the lottery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumerman77 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 1 hour ago, chickenman92 said: I have s feeling the Canucks get leapfrogged and end up picking 4th. If I'm picking fourth, I'm taking Tkachuk and I could see Beijing doing the same thing - real meat n potatoes guy with a 200 ft game and grit. Odds are that we will be 4th or higher. Benning seems to really like guys who have good shots and are strong north-south skater (see Virtanen, Boeser, Etem, Vrbata (shot-wise), even McCann & Granlund could be placed in that group. Moreover Benning has stated numerous times that he looks for the kind of guys when scouting. From the way I see it Baertschi and Vey are the only two young guys Benning brought in who could be classified as play-makers. Although I am all for selecting BPA I think play-making skill should be prioritized in order for the aforementioned "shoot first" guys to maximize their potential. I'm not sure if Tkachuk is that guy. To me he seems to have a similar skill-set as Virtanen (albeit perhaps better). That really only leaves Dubois or Nylander if we are going to go the forward route. I'm not sure if either of those guys are better, although I do like Dubois. Admittedly I haven't seen much of Nylander outside of the WJC and some highlights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Top 3 or one of Juolevi, Sergachev and Chychrun. Dubois, Tkachuk, Nylander etc are all good forwards but none of them are ahead of the D as BPA. Only way we get a forward with our 1st IMO, is winning a lotto pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandre Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 12 minutes ago, Aleksander Barkov said: April 30th is my birthday! My only birthday wish is for the Canucks to win the lottery. Because of this, I sincerely wish you a happy birthday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandre Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 1 minute ago, J.R. said: Top 3 or one of Juolevi, Sergachev and Chychrun. Dubois, Tkachuk, Nylander etc are all good forwards but none of them are ahead of the D as BPA. Only way we get a forward with our 1st IMO, is winning a lotto pick. Even though I really like Tkachuk and Dubois, I totally agree with you. How would you rate the top six? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowardrobertford Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 12 minutes ago, J.R. said: Top 3 or one of Juolevi, Sergachev and Chychrun. Dubois, Tkachuk, Nylander etc are all good forwards but none of them are ahead of the D as BPA. Only way we get a forward with our 1st IMO, is winning a lotto pick. I disagree, D's are riskier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumerman77 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 20 minutes ago, Cowardrobertford said: I disagree, D's are riskier This is very true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putgolzin Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 14 hours ago, Junkyard Dog said: Crawford, Matthews coach, compared Matthews to McDavid without the extra gear and more of a shooter, Kopitar with the pace he plays with and Sakic with the shot and release. I thought that was an amazing analysis while he was going through that. Then I remembered the time Crawford was working as an analyst and talked about how Cody Hodgson reminded him of the best player Crawford ever played with, possibly the most under-rated player of all time Mr. Dale Hawerchuk... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 34 minutes ago, J.R. said: Top 3 or one of Juolevi, Sergachev and Chychrun. Dubois, Tkachuk, Nylander etc are all good forwards but none of them are ahead of the D as BPA. Only way we get a forward with our 1st IMO, is winning a lotto pick. Too risky, too far off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putgolzin Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 I'm new to this thread, is there a place where someone has tracked through what we have in each round? I'm guessing Columbus doesn't opt to give us their 2nd rounder this year, so at this point we have just our own picks in the first two rounds? And after that? Apologies if this has already been discussed ad nauseum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleksander Barkov Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Anyone have any good player comparisons for any of Puljujarvi, Tkatchuk, McLeod, Chychrun, Sergachev, Juolevi, Bean? - Mathews was compared to Sakic/Kopitar by Crawford. - Laine offensive game resembles that of the great 8 Alex Ovechkin. - Dubois plays a lot like Jamie Benn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumerman77 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 1 minute ago, Aleksander Barkov said: Anyone have any good player comparisons for any of Puljujarvi, Tkatchuk, McLeod, Chychrun, Sergachev, Juolevi, Bean? - Mathews was compared to Sakic/Kopitar by Crawford. - Laine offensive game resembles that of the great 8 Alex Ovechkin. - Dubois plays a lot like Jamie Benn. Puljujarvi style-wise reminds me of Jagr and Malkin. Big body that can skate. Shields the puck well using his body. Has very good puck-handling skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chickenman92 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 I really don't get people that like Dubois over Tkachuk... Dudois has inferior stats, in an inferior league and plays in an inferior junior program. I think he'll be an okay NHL player, but there is no comparison to Matthew Tkachuk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby_Lu1ngo Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Extremely happy with any of the top 3 of course. Still happy with tkachuk chychrun or sergachev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 10 minutes ago, chickenman92 said: I really don't get people that like Dubois over Tkachuk... Dudois has inferior stats, in an inferior league and plays in an inferior junior program. I think he'll be an okay NHL player, but there is no comparison to Matthew Tkachuk. I think Tkachuk is inflated by the rest of London knights. I don't really buy into the hype tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.