-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Total expected value of picks in the 2016 NHL Entry Draft by team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 If the rumors are true of Calgary wanting to trade up, and Montreal wanting to be in a position to draft Dubois, with both Edmonton and CBJ being talked about as moving their respective picks; i could see the following happen: Trade 1: CGY 3rd Overall Clarkson (cap dump) CBJ 6th overall Smid Kylington Trade 2: MON 4th overall EDM 9th Overall 39th Overall Gallagher Then the draft: 1. TOR - Auston Matthews 2. WPG - Patrik Laine 3. CGY - Matthew Tkachuk 4. MON - Pierre-Luc Dubois 5. VAN - Jesse Puljujarvi Unlikely, but both the teams trading up are targeting someone. With Montreal, that's Dubois and I believe the Calgary rumor centers around Tkachuk. That would leave the Canucks in the fortunate position of drafting Puljujarvi. Not a likelihood, but a possibility from the teams wanting to move up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 If we get Puljujarvi at #5 I'll just slowly shake my head and laugh like I'm insane. This can't really happen, can it? My hopes just can't take thinking about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 1 minute ago, Ossi Vaananen said: If the rumors are true of Calgary wanting to trade up, and Montreal wanting to be in a position to draft Dubois, with both Edmonton and CBJ being talked about as moving their respective picks; i could see the following happen: Trade 1: CGY 3rd Overall Clarkson (cap dump) CBJ 6th overall Smid Kylington Trade 2: MON 4th overall EDM 9th Overall 39th Overall Gallagher Then the draft: 1. TOR - Auston Matthews 2. WPG - Patrik Laine 3. CGY - Matthew Tkachuk 4. MON - Pierre-Luc Dubois 5. VAN - Jesse Puljujarvi Unlikely, but both the teams trading up are targeting someone. With Montreal, that's Dubois and I believe the Calgary rumor centers around Tkachuk. That would leave the Canucks in the fortunate position of drafting Puljujarvi. Not a likelihood, but a possibility from the teams wanting to move up. CGY and even MON would be stupid to pass up on Jesse Puljujarvi. If we somehow get Puljujarvi, I'll run naked around Rogers Arena Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Our luck we trade the #5 and Puljujarvi drops to Calgary at #6. I really hope if we trade the #5, it's during our turn, knowing who is actually available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 4 minutes ago, Cowichan Canuck said: Our luck we trade the #5 and Puljujarvi drops to Calgary at #6. I really hope if we trade the #5, it's during our turn, knowing who is actually available. We'll have the most leverage at that point too. Assuming PLD is still there, we can name our price with MTL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven pounds soft Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 43 minutes ago, Cowichan Canuck said: If we get Puljujarvi at #5 I'll just slowly shake my head and laugh like I'm insane. This can't really happen, can it? My hopes just can't take thinking about it. Same here. That would make my year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven pounds soft Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 49 minutes ago, Odd. said: CGY and even MON would be stupid to pass up on Jesse Puljujarvi. If we somehow get Puljujarvi, I'll run naked around Rogers Arena Lol I'd like to see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 15 minutes ago, Seven pounds soft said: Lol I'd like to see that. 6'2 lanky guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCK-EXPRESS Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Take BPA and I'll be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 2 hours ago, MoneypuckOverlord said: $&!#ty way of managing a hockey team then. If he was Peter Dundass from Coquitlam BC does it mean they don't go for him? Good teams have no Bias. Except this kid is ranked # 4 by most scouts, according to Bob Mackenzie. If he's still there at five, and Arizona trades with us, would MT not be the BPA? Don't teams, at the top of the draft, go for the BPA? If the kid was a schmuck I could see your POV, but he's a very good (elite) prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 2 hours ago, Ossi Vaananen said: If the rumors are true of Calgary wanting to trade up, and Montreal wanting to be in a position to draft Dubois, with both Edmonton and CBJ being talked about as moving their respective picks; i could see the following happen: Trade 1: CGY 3rd Overall Clarkson (cap dump) CBJ 6th overall Smid Kylington Trade 2: MON 4th overall EDM 9th Overall 39th Overall Gallagher Then the draft: 1. TOR - Auston Matthews 2. WPG - Patrik Laine 3. CGY - Matthew Tkachuk 4. MON - Pierre-Luc Dubois 5. VAN - Jesse Puljujarvi Unlikely, but both the teams trading up are targeting someone. With Montreal, that's Dubois and I believe the Calgary rumor centers around Tkachuk. That would leave the Canucks in the fortunate position of drafting Puljujarvi. Not a likelihood, but a possibility from the teams wanting to move up. Gallagher is a key guy on the Habs roster is he not ?.... ,that trade would put quite the dent in this upcoming seasons playoff hopes..IMO.(unless they made a massive splash in UFA)..Especially for a prospect that is not even expected to crack the NHL till 2017-18....Montreal is in no position to trade any key players off of their roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosierdaddy Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 regardless of whatever moves everyone else makes the Canucks end up with a future first liner unless they move down. Let manoeuvring begin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camel Toe Drag Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 MT does seems like the typical Torts player to be honest. Even though GM's usually dont dabble in the coaches opinion of who should be drafted, you have to think that Tkachuk and Torts would be BFF's. Im actually preparing myself for anything come draft day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven pounds soft Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 2 hours ago, Odd. said: 6'2 lanky guy Hahah I'd happily watch if we got JP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honeydew Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Trade the farm draft 1,2,3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 32 minutes ago, Seven pounds soft said: Hahah I'd happily watch if we got JP join, it's going to be hectic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 5 hours ago, Cowichan Canuck said: If we get Puljujarvi at #5 I'll just slowly shake my head and laugh like I'm insane. This can't really happen, can it? My hopes just can't take thinking about it. I remember 2 years ago today, we had the same reaction with possibility of Sam Bennet falling down to 6th. Really aint happening. Just prepare for Tkachuk or Dubois, that is all, I'm happy with either, we can use a Left winger, they are harder to come by nowadays, and we need one, because we really don't have a left winger in the system (Tkachuk) Dubois can be a future centreman for us, we also don't have a future top line centreman, I think he can be one for our team like Kopitar / Bergeron syle for us, not to mention he also can play the Left wing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven pounds soft Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 56 minutes ago, MoneypuckOverlord said: I remember 2 years ago today, we had the same reaction with possibility of Sam Bennet falling down to 6th. Really aint happening. Just prepare for Tkachuk or Dubois, that is all, I'm happy with either, we can use a Left winger, they are harder to come by nowadays, and we need one, because we really don't have a left winger in the system (Tkachuk) Dubois can be a future centreman for us, we also don't have a future top line centreman, I think he can be one for our team like Kopitar / Bergeron syle for us, not to mention he also can play the Left wing.We all know it's not likely. But it's not impossible. So let us have our fun. Its ok. You want to be the voice of reason. I get it. We all know it's not likely to happen. No reason we must approach this exactly like you. We have a right to get our hopes up. Nashville didn't expect Seth Jones to drop to 4th. He was 1st overall in a lot of the rankings. That was less likely than us getting Jesse P is. IMNPO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 7 hours ago, Cowichan Canuck said: If we get Puljujarvi at #5 I'll just slowly shake my head and laugh like I'm insane. This can't really happen, can it? My hopes just can't take thinking about it. Friday is already going to be a good day for me, so if that somehow happens I'm not sure how anything can top that. Unfortunately the universe just doesn't work that way for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.