Tangelos Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Lack has been average overall since Miller's been injured. Markstrom will be sent down and Miller will be the number 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongrel Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 The issue I have is the time off for Miller. It's tough to throw him back in net after five or six weeks off. I'm not sure it's that difficult. No more difficult than it was to throw Lack into the starting job. I would think before they let him come back they would get some practices under his belt and make sure he's in game shape. We're looking ok but it wouldn't take much for this team to be on the outside looking in. Can't see the team just throwing him in as soon as he's off the ir if he wasn't ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongrel Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Lack has been average overall since Miller's been injured. Markstrom will be sent down and Miller will be the number 1. More often than not Lack has actually been far above average. He's had some stinkers and he's also had some (more) great games. The rest have been good. Miller will be back as the number 1 for sure but don't sell Lack short. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFirstLine Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Lack has been average overall since Miller's been injured. Markstrom will be sent down and Miller will be the number 1. .930 save percentage or more in every game since Millers been injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 .930 save percentage or more in every game since Millers been injured. Boston: .976 Buffalo: .783 St. Louis: .872 Arizona: .943 San Jose: .950 So no, he has not had at least a .930 SV% since Miller's injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CeeBee51 Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 What a nice problem to have. 2 goalies who can both be #1's. I see Markstrom getting traded this summer, especially if they sign O'Connor and Eddie slowly eating into Millers playing time for the next 2 seasons. What a luxury to have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Give the ball to Miller so he can get run over in the playoffs and not Eddie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Templeton Peck Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 We create an unnecessary goalie controversy and then trade both goalies away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Boston: .976Buffalo: .783St. Louis: .872Arizona: .943San Jose: .950So no, he has not had at least a .930 SV% since Miller's injury.you missed the game on the island where he was first star and got miller the W after miller left hurt...stopped 27 of 27 s% 1.000,and when he came in quick on a night he thought he had off and stopped 23 of 24 after bailing out markstrom s% .958 he didnt have a great night in buffalo or st louis but tell me who on the team did?? we wouldve had the same result if we had broduer in his prime in net those games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goat James Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Easy. 1.You send down Markstrom. 2. Eddie Lack rests, becomes our backup again. 3. You go with Miller on a nightly basis since he's our starting goalie. 4.???? 5. No goalie controversy. That wasn't so hard now was it? I'm on my cell phone so I can't +1 you, but I am this close to clicking the "full version" button just to +1 you for that amazing comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Give the ball to Miller so he can get run over in the playoffs and not Eddie.you would have to be in the way of something to get run over.. last year in st louis miller looked like he was playing dodge ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 you would have to be in the way of something to get run over.. last year in st louis miller looked like he was playing dodge ball. touche. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Boston: .976Buffalo: .783St. Louis: .872Arizona: .943San Jose: .950So no, he has not had at least a .930 SV% since Miller's injury.i think he misspoke a little ,but since eddie came in on the island his save % is .930 and a 2.41 GAA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFirstLine Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Boston: .976 Buffalo: .783 St. Louis: .872 Arizona: .943 San Jose: .950 So no, he has not had at least a .930 SV% since Miller's injury. Yeah might have misread on the stats a bit there ... Well atleast above .930 in 4/7 games since Millers injury vs the Rangers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAY JAY Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 What to do when Miller returns from injury? Continue watching or listening to the games. Go Canucks Go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_lai416 Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 The issue I have is the time off for Miller. It's tough to throw him back in net after five or six weeks off. what issue? you guys were willing to throw schneider back in net after coming off an injury in the middle of the playoff when he's not even 100% healthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 what issue? you guys were willing to throw schneider back in net after coming off an injury in the middle of the playoff when he's not even 100% healthythat was after 2 losses and our team was looking for any kind of spark and Lu wasn't making a difference in the games either. different situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Monahan Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 what issue? you guys were willing to throw schneider back in net after coming off an injury in the middle of the playoff when he's not even 100% healthy I can't speak for the rest of CDC but I wasn't even a member here when Schneider was around. And I'm not sure how to double quote on my phone, but what he said there ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yes we can nucks Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 It's not that complicated. When Miller's back from injury, he plays because he's the #1. If he struggles in the first game he gets another game. If he struggles again, play Eddie. At this point when every game is important, there's a very small margin for error. Whoever is playing better gets to keep playing from here on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 here is a little break down...february for miller he played in 8 games ( one of the games was only 1 period before he got hurt) in those 8 appearance he had a combined 4-4 record (one win should be lacks as it was the islander game).893 S%, 3.23 GAA and faced on averaged 25 shots per game.Eddie since comming in is 3-1-1 (and a couple no decisions as he came in for miller when hurt and markstrom vs SJ) hes had a combined .930 S% , 2.41 GAA and has faced on average in this stretch 32 shots per game....so which one has just been average? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.