EagleShield Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 After last night's performance () and with Niemi going UFA this year (and with no starter in their prospect pool): To SJS: Eddie Lack To VAN: 2015 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 And if Miller gets hurt next season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Depends of Markstrom is ready or not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiffyPB Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 No team would ever pay a 1st for Lack, who is only signed for 1 more year after this. He is worth a 2nd round pick at best but will most likely only fetch a 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 lol no way im trading lack for a second hes way to valueable to the team if anyones traded its markstrom maybe miller at deadline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerines Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 That's a fair deal. I'd only trade him for a first at this point. Preferably to the east. If no one is willing to give up a first for him then I'd rather keep him and trade Miller next year at the deadline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter_74 Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 To me, Lack is a guy you want in the dressing room. He always has a smile on his face and he always has a positive attitude. Not once did he let his situation effect that. He is also a very capable backup, and can be a stopgap for other tenders to develop. Keep Lack, trade Miller or Markstrom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desiboynux4lifee******* Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 This thread is back!!!!!! Couldn't you guys wait until off-season, until you make these glorious trade proposals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nurf Herder Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Goalie markets saturated, nobody will pay a first for a relatively unproven, average goaltender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Sock Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 I'll take Goldobin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 After last night's performance ( ) and with Niemi going UFA this year (and with no starter in their prospect pool): To SJS: Eddie Lack To VAN: 2015 1st was thinking about this last night as well! He would do well for SJS and would love it there and the fans would love him, it would be great for their team. Niemi looked so shaky all night mis handling pucks that slowly dribbled towards him. But with the hype around this draft, SJS will want something more - id be willing to add in Jensen - I just never liked the pick and do not have much time for big guys who dont use their size. he is a pretty one dimensional player. I would do something like To SJS: Lack and Jensen To VAN: SJS 1st in 2015 and 2nd in 2016 or 2015 SJS' choice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 That's a fair deal. I'd only trade him for a first at this point. Preferably to the east. If no one is willing to give up a first for him then I'd rather keep him and trade Miller next year at the deadline. There is a problem in waiting till the deadline. We lose Markstrom on waivers for nothing at the start of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 We should send a 'tender to Buff. They have more valuable prospects/picks than they can handle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Lack need stay ...trade markstrom instead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 Do the CDC people who propose these trades own their own businesses? I can just imagine walking into their store and finding an 80 dollar price tag on some old hammer you could get for 20 bucks. Not that Eddie doesn't have an 80 dollar personality... But come on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 Lack has more value, but Markstrom has more potential. The logical move would be to package Eddie for either a young scorer or young top 4 D man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaSwede Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 The move that is most logical is trading Lack. Markstrom isn't far behind at all. One bad game and CDC thinks hes a massive bust. I still have a lot of hope for Markstrom and was delighted when he came here in a trade. He is also younger than Lack and with Lack having higher trade value it just makes sense. I think the best option in trading lack is in a package deal. Lack + asset = very good asset If you look at the goalie market there is more supply than demand for quality goalies. San Jose is an option but there are a lot of other teams out there moving goalies around this summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimp C Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Just trade Miller for future considerations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Just trade Miller for future considerations Sure if the plan is rebuilding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.