Mathew Barzal Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 Referees gon' ref! Commentators gon' commentate! Dubnyk gon' smack a b****! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdatb Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 thought you were talking about tonight's game, from the thread title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted March 15, 2015 Author Share Posted March 15, 2015 thought you were talking about tonight's game, from the thread title. ops. I'll change it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papagrizz Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 wow that commentator is dumb, you can clearly see on the 2nd video that the netting is infront of the puck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 Wow... That's incredible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steen Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 "That's a good goal!" haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desiboynux4lifee******* Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 I think that's good ole Darren Pang? lol If anyone can find the Minnesota wild commentators please post it here because those guys are the biggest homers alive lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 play by play guys a tool what a homer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DollarAndADream Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 Looool the commentator is so sure of it being a goal. Darren Pang, isn't it? Sounds like him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 Darren Pang is literally the worst commentator in all of sports, mixed with the worst referee in all of sports, Tim Peel. Recipe for a gong show right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 play by play guys a tool what a homer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where's Wellwood Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 Wow. That commentator and the refs, and even the goal reviewers in Toronto are so dumb. How do they not see it wasn't in the net? The netting was clearly in front of the puck at one angle, and clearly not in the net from another angle. Don't they look at all angles when doing a goal review? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustapha Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 At least they caught it in time. Had they dropped the puck after the first review, that would have counted. The 'war room' in Toronto should be able to look at a goal from ALL available angles before rendering a call. Had they done that the first time, there wouldn't have been any confusion. In some respects, the NHL remains a bush league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoshiyoshi Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 Wow. That commentator and the refs, and even the goal reviewers in Toronto are so dumb. How do they not see it wasn't in the net? The netting was clearly in front of the puck at one angle, and clearly not in the net from another angle. Don't they look at all angles when doing a goal review? if it hadnt been pointed out to us we probably would have missed it from that camera angle too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 "There's no question mark that that's a good goal..." "Oh wait, the question mark is whether or not the puck went in the net". Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where's Wellwood Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 if it hadnt been pointed out to us we probably would have missed it from that camera angle too. But they should be looking at all camera angles regardless. By trying to review only the height of the stick, the goal reviewers are missing the forest for the trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N7Nucks Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 I was so hoping that it would count. Just for the added laughs. That was clearly a good goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 Proof that even the goal reviewers in TO don't put in any effort when making a call. Good on Dubnyk for getting the refs attention in time before puck drop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks.bradley Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 Wow. That commentator and the refs, and even the goal reviewers in Toronto are so dumb. How do they not see it wasn't in the net? The netting was clearly in front of the puck at one angle, and clearly not in the net from another angle. Don't they look at all angles when doing a goal review? I'm going to assume they didn't have that second angle till it showed up on broadcast... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Aerosex Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 "The play is being reviewed. Again." Cracked me up what a $&!#show, can't believe that went unnoticed for so long in the NHfreakinL. Never looked like it was in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.