Scorvat Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 No, just no. We don't need to draft 2 Virtanens back-to-back with the 6th overalls. (Only difference is one passes, the other shoots) If one passes and one shoots, and their both physical beasts. Then im all for it!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorvat Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 this happens: trade: lack + higgins to san jose for a 2nd and a 4th trade: Bieksa + Burrows + 4th to montreal for a 1st trade: Hamhuis + Corrado + montreals 1st _________________________________________________________________________________ (6)(19)(43)(109)(139)(146) who would you draft? Higgins and Lack for a 2nd and 4th? Really? How about Higgins to pittsburgh for a 2nd. Lack/Markstrom to a team for a high 2nd low 3rd. So there i basically increased the 4th to a 2nd/3rd. Bieksa will not waive to go anywhere. Maybe Burrows to Mtl for a 3rd (free 4.5M) in cap space. Just LOL LOL LOL LOL... LOL LOL at the Hamhuis trade. So basically Lack/Markstrom Higgins Burrows For 2nd 2nd/3rd 3rd And if Barzal moves dow to 10-12 i would trade our 1st + 3rd + Gaunce at most to get him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 lol i dont have emotional problems with players, i dont feel guilt trading a player, i like him but thats not even close to a reason to keep a player, he doesnt fit on next years roster its pretty simple... Have you seen how well Lack has been playing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horvat Posted March 16, 2015 Author Share Posted March 16, 2015 So you get pissy when people shoot down your proposals without offering their own but you laugh at a poster that does offer proposals, which IMO weren't all that unrealistic. That is not the Horvatian way i was just too lazy, pilon is a terrible pick in the early 2nd, i could see mid to late, he has incosistancy issues and scince the start of the year he has been in a downwards trend, and theres no way you can get andersson at 75th... sorry for not explaining myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted March 17, 2015 Share Posted March 17, 2015 depends how management sees us in the plans for 5 years and maybe they trade Lack cause he would get us more then Markstrom,if not then markstrom will go but one has to,and Bieksa + Burrows + Hamhuis will not be moved as they can say NO! Higgins can to but he might want to go to a contender like Montreal which he has played for before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Monahan Posted March 17, 2015 Share Posted March 17, 2015 i was just too lazy, pilon is a terrible pick in the early 2nd, i could see mid to late, he has incosistancy issues and scince the start of the year he has been in a downwards trend, and theres no way you can get andersson at 75th... sorry for not explaining myself. "just too lazy" doesn't cut it when you're flaming everybody else for their lack of insight. It goes both ways. I'd rather see Dunn at that pick anyway if that was doable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shink Posted March 20, 2015 Share Posted March 20, 2015 "just too lazy" doesn't cut it when you're flaming everybody else for their lack of insight. It goes both ways. I'd rather see Dunn at that pick anyway if that was doable. This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted March 20, 2015 Share Posted March 20, 2015 Higgins and Lack for a 2nd and 4th? Really? How about Higgins to pittsburgh for a 2nd. Lack/Markstrom to a team for a high 2nd low 3rd. So there i basically increased the 4th to a 2nd/3rd. Bieksa will not waive to go anywhere. Maybe Burrows to Mtl for a 3rd (free 4.5M) in cap space. Just LOL LOL LOL LOL... LOL LOL at the Hamhuis trade. So basically Lack/Markstrom Higgins Burrows For 2nd 2nd/3rd 3rd And if Barzal moves dow to 10-12 i would trade our 1st + 3rd + Gaunce at most to get him Barzal is worth more than that so if that happens I would be super happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted March 21, 2015 Share Posted March 21, 2015 rasmus is rated 84th but i think he will go early 3rd or late second round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 21, 2015 Share Posted March 21, 2015 seriously undervaluing these assets and overvaluing picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.