Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Lack Tweets


avelanch

Recommended Posts

I love Eddie. I was amazed when he skated to centre ice and started calling out Quick. He's the last guy I expected that from.

It sucks that he's probably gone soon.

I hope not.

Last year was a huge learning curve for Lack and he learned from it as evidenced by the past 10-15 games.

I think he is a solid goalie which makes Miller and his large contract expendable. Miller was also playing well but when factoring age, contract, future, it makes more sense to keep Lack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Eddie. I was amazed when he skated to centre ice and started calling out Quick. He's the last guy I expected that from.

It sucks that he's probably gone soon.

wheres he going? do you really think canucks are trading him? why hes a guaranteed backup til millers gone hell he has better numbers than miller for what reason would you trade him hes signed at 1.2 mill per for another season you win cups with players like lack horvat kenins cheap contracts stealing wins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wheres he going? do you really think canucks are trading him? why hes a guaranteed backup til millers gone hell he has better numbers than miller for what reason would you trade him hes signed at 1.2 mill per for another season you win cups with players like lack horvat kenins cheap contracts stealing wins

becaus if we dont we lose bothe eriksson and markstrom dumb***

Link to comment
Share on other sites

becaus if we dont we lose bothe eriksson and markstrom dumb***

Sometimes the trades you don't make is the actual winner.

At the end of the day, i would rather have Lack than Eriksson and Markstrom. Eriksson and Markstrom might not have the value Lack does but then again, do we want to go with inferior goaltending just so that we could recoup a 2nd rounder who may or may not pan out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes the trades you don't make is the actual winner.

At the end of the day, i would rather have Lack than Eriksson and Markstrom. Eriksson and Markstrom might not have the value Lack does but then again, do we want to go with inferior goaltending just so that we could recoup a 2nd rounder who may or may not pan out?

That's the way I'm looking at it. Unless Eddie can somehow bring us back a blue-ish chip defense prospect, I'd rather hang on to him and miller going forward. Then look at moving miller down the road. I'd lose markstrom on waivers or take a small return before I give up a potential starter entering his prime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes the trades you don't make is the actual winner.

At the end of the day, i would rather have Lack than Eriksson and Markstrom. Eriksson and Markstrom might not have the value Lack does but then again, do we want to go with inferior goaltending just so that we could recoup a 2nd rounder who may or may not pan out?

Bingo.

I'll add, if Miller goes down to injury then Markstrom becomes your #1. Markstrom isn't even a bonafide back up yet, I'll risk trading him away for cheap at this point. The Canucks have the goaltending depth to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd be fine losing eriksson to europe (but really i doubt he takes off, ), and i really don't think markstrom would be lost on waivers, to be honest. teams are not going to take a gamble of someone who put together a single good game, and a 4 shot stinker. still too many questions up in the air with him, not proven at all, and honestly, not that big of a loss if he does get claimed. (or you can try moving him at the draft i guess if there's interest, i just don't see them getting a return on him...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best use of a hashtag I've ever seen!

Too bad he felt the need to defend it (and imply he was saying what exactly?!)

Yeah it's a shame some people are getting mad at eddie for it, but lack made a rookie twitter mistake. He forgot to add the period before miller's twitter handle so everyone could see that tweet. Even if you go to lack's twitter page directly, you have to click on tweets and replies to see the miller tweet. Without the period, then only people who follow both lack and miller would see the first tweet so most people lacked context for the followup lucic tweet and thought lack was tweeting that out of the blue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it's a shame some people are getting mad at eddie for it, but lack made a rookie twitter mistake. He forgot to add the period before miller's twitter handle so everyone could see that tweet. Even if you go to lack's twitter page directly, you have to click on tweets and replies to see the miller tweet. Without the period, then only people who follow both lack and miller would see the first tweet so most people lacked context for the followup lucic tweet and thought lack was tweeting that out of the blue.

Ah. Thanks for the explanation of how the context was missed because I can't see the tweet either, just had read about it here first.

Even still, I don't need context to agree with Lack's use of the hashtag. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...