oldnews Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 He wasn't ready and Crabb still missed. No wonder why he's in the AHL Also did this really deserve a thread in the prospect section? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 Happened a while ago, goalie wasn't aware that he was shooting yet. guy missed anyways, would have counted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 Swear I've seen this on here, but when did either of them become a Canucks prospect or a part of the Utica Comets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noseforthenet Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 Happened a while ago, goalie wasn't aware that he was shooting yet. guy missed anyways, would have counted.I guess you could say that's... OLD NEWS!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBackup Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Swear I've seen this on here, but when did either of them become a Canucks prospect or a part of the Utica Comets? Swear I've seen a post with you mini-modding before, but I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbadcanucks Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 That's a great clip. Would have never seen it unless it was here in this thread. Joey Crabb...probably couldn't score on the plywood Mr. Goalie at 8 Rinks. Hard to believe he's got 179 NHL games to his credit (mind you, most of those games were with the Maple Leafs, so I guess they don't really count). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted April 21, 2015 Author Share Posted April 21, 2015 He wasn't ready and Crabb still missed. No wonder why he's in the AHL Also did this really deserve a thread in the prospect section? Yeah, belongs in the AHL forum. Oh well. Thanks to the mod who moved this. Sorry about the braincramp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted April 21, 2015 Author Share Posted April 21, 2015 I guess you could say that's... OLD NEWS!!!! You're welcome to show me where it's been posted. Your search engine must be better than mine. And btw, extra points for originality. Swear I've seen this on here, but when did either of them become a Canucks prospect or a part of the Utica Comets? Can't get anyhing past you.. You are the king.... Of mini-mods. Anyhow, I searched Bartosak in every forum - came up nowhere but in the hockey pool threads. My sincerest apologies - I put this here by mistake thinking I'd searched the AHL thread last - but almost pleased with the mistake because I always enjoy your posts so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Fwiw the CDC search engine is weird. I always get completely unrelated threads when I search something up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Swear I've seen a post with you mini-modding before, but I could be wrong. And I swear I've seen you post on topic before, but that's certainly not the case here. Relax, it was in the wrong spot and I wasn't the first person to make note of it. ... Anyhow, I searched Bartosak in every forum - came up nowhere but in the hockey pool threads. My sincerest apologies - I put this here by mistake thinking I'd searched the AHL thread last - but almost pleased with the mistake because I always enjoy your posts so much. Yeah, I took a look around but I know I've seen it. Maybe it was on PHT or possibly Twitter or something since I don't go to many other hockey sites. But it's a little weird without the context of what happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted April 21, 2015 Author Share Posted April 21, 2015 Yeah, I took a look around but I know I've seen it. Maybe it was on PHT or possibly Twitter or something since I don't go to many other hockey sites. But it's a little weird without the context of what happened. Good for you. You saw it. Perhaps a bit narcissistic of you, but beleve it or not, I didn't ask myself 'has elvis seen this?' before posting. I thought the search engine might suffice. Next time I'll pm you before posting, k. Sorry about putting it in the wrong forum king. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Good for you. You saw it. Perhaps a bit narcissistic of you, but beleve it or not, I didn't ask myself 'has elvis seen this?' before posting. I thought the search engine might suffice. Next time I'll pm you before posting, k. Sorry about putting it in the wrong forum king. Sounds good to me. Feel free to PM me in case of any other mistakes as well... Speaking of the context: http://www.jewelsfromthecrown.com/2015/4/4/8346933/monarchs-bartosak-misses-whistle-still-makes-save With the Manchester Monarchs in a shootout against the Hartford Wolfpack, the ref blew the whistle to allow Joey Crabb to take his attempt on net. One problem: Patrik Bartosak didn't hear the whistle and had no idea that the play was live. Turns out, it didn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted April 21, 2015 Author Share Posted April 21, 2015 Sounds good to me. : :D Feel free to PM me in case of any other mistakes as well... Speaking of the context: http://www.jewelsfromthecrown.com/2015/4/4/8346933/monarchs-bartosak-misses-whistle-still-makes-save Did you really need the context spelled out for you? You know elvis, mods have asked/encouraged/instructed/warned me to not be abusive, so I'm doing my best - they've also asked you to cut the mini-mod act, as have literally hundreds of other posters around here, so you'll have to forgive me if I forget to pm you and expect you to exercise as much discretion with your interventions as you expect due diligence of other posters. The fact here, at least as it appeared to me by process of searching, is that this was not posted before. So I accept your apology and assume likewise. My opinion is that filling in 'context' before the video is not only not necessary, but is kind of like spelling out a punchline before delivering a joke. The context "stares down" was enough imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 I'm not worried about the "literally" hundreds of other posters, and I've talked with the mods both in threads and through PMs so I know full well where I stand on that. But I'm just talking about having seen it before and adding context for those that'd like it - I thought the big smile emoticon would be enough to make that last bit about the PMs obvious as sarcasm. As for the replies about the thread's location (from more than just me) at the start, you have to be prepared for that if you put something in the wrong spot. Let's just get back to being amiable posters having intelligent discussions on a forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamJamIam Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 I'm not worried about the "literally" hundreds of other posters, and I've talked with the mods both in threads and through PMs so I know full well where I stand on that. But I'm just talking about having seen it before and adding context for those that'd like it - I thought the big smile emoticon would be enough to make that last bit about the PMs obvious as sarcasm. As for the replies about the thread's location (from more than just me) at the start, you have to be prepared for that if you put something in the wrong spot. Let's just get back to being amiable posters having intelligent discussions on a forum. That's the coward's way! 13 rounds of bareknuckle boxing is the only way to settle this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 That's the coward's way! 13 rounds of bareknuckle boxing is the only way to settle this... Maybe we can get a ref that'll blow the whistle really quietly so only one of us hears it (preferably me)! I'd have to make sure to 'score' on my first attempt though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.