Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

New NHL Franchises now 500 million? Griffiths should have kept the team


grandmaster

Recommended Posts

Not sure if this should be general or Canucks forum but the question I wonder is the changes of value for the Canucks.

Apparently Buttman is saying new franchises like the one being looked at in Vegas would cost buyers a ridiculous half a billion dollars!

http://m.thestar.com/#/article/sports/hockey/2015/04/24/bettman-thinks-500-million-reasonable-for-nhl-expansion-franchise.html

Can someone give a timeline of the value of the Canucks? In particular how much Arthur Griffiths sold to Mcaw and later to the Aqualini family.

If only Arthur was able to hang on. I think I read the poor guy is now broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Griffiths put their own capital into the team to keep them a float and in Vancouver for many years. Without the Griffiths, we wouldn't have the Canucks to support. When they sold to McCaw (they sold the arena, the Canucks and the Grizzilies), part of the deal was McCaw was to keep the Canucks in Vancouver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Griffiths put their own capital into the team to keep them a float and in Vancouver for many years. Without the Griffiths, we wouldn't have the Canucks to support. When they sold to McCaw (they sold the arena, the Canucks and the Grizzilies), part of the deal was McCaw was to keep the Canucks in Vancouver.

No there was no agreement in the sale. McCaw was sole owner and could do as he wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No there was no agreement in the sale. McCaw was sole owner and could do as he wanted.

I stand corrected, McCaw was originally bought in as a partner at a time when Arthur was looking at various options including selling to someone who would intend to keep the team in Vancouver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand corrected, McCaw was originally bought in as a partner at a time when Arthur was looking at various options including selling to someone who would intend to keep the team in Vancouver.

It's too bad Arthur didn't approach either the Aquilini family or Tom Gaglardi instead of McCaw. Gretzky would have been a Canuck, Quinn would have stayed on and most of all, there never would have been an orca logo as the face of the Canucks' brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asset inflation since the Feds started printing money. Aquilini bought 50% back in 04 and the rest in 06. Seeing the value of the Canucks going 4 folds in 10 years seems reasonable. Heck just look at Vancouver property in 04 compare to now ! lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this should be general or Canucks forum but the question I wonder is the changes of value for the Canucks.

Apparently Buttman is saying new franchises like the one being looked at in Vegas would cost buyers a ridiculous half a billion dollars!

http://m.thestar.com/#/article/sports/hockey/2015/04/24/bettman-thinks-500-million-reasonable-for-nhl-expansion-franchise.html

Can someone give a timeline of the value of the Canucks? In particular how much Arthur Griffiths sold to Mcaw and later to the Aqualini family.

If only Arthur was able to hang on. I think I read the poor guy is now broke.

He has been broke for decades. Sadly, he was a terrible business man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

basically buttman saying he doesn't want an expansion team, but heres this ridiculous price. best wait for a team to sell then relocate? :x

Not a ridiculous price. The NHL won't let Arizona, Florida, Carolina, or Atlanta happen again, and that's why they have the price so high as well as why the ticket drive happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...