Ghostsof1915 Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 Cleaner than Hydro? The method may be clean. Flooding river valleys and making artificial lakes isn't too good for local flora and fauna. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 Cleaner than Hydro? Tell me what should a country like australia invest in to help solve their energy problems ? Hydro or solar ? Which would be the more practical , viable solution ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted June 1, 2015 Author Share Posted June 1, 2015 Tell me what should a country like australia invest in to help solve their energy problems ? Hydro or solar ? Which would be the more practical , viable solution ? I don't know - unfortunately, I've never been to Australia. My comment wasn't about what is more practical for different areas of the world - I was commenting on Hugor Hill's comment that he said solar was "cleaner than what we're using now". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted June 1, 2015 Author Share Posted June 1, 2015 The method may be clean. Flooding river valleys and making artificial lakes isn't too good for local flora and fauna. True, but in the end it provides a nice habitat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 I don't know - unfortunately, I've never been to Australia. My comment wasn't about what is more practical for different areas of the world - I was commenting on Hugor Hill's comment that he said solar was "cleaner than what we're using now". See this is the problem , we as a species have to think globally. I know with out researching that Canada has vast water reserves and a lot more rivers than Aus that could be harnessed for hydro powered generators. A little research shows that Canada leads the world in hydro-electricity production , one source claiming over 90% of power produced in BC is hydro. It is very common knowledge that australia is the driest continent on this planet. It is also common knowledge that aus is a very sunny place So what do think australians should invest in ? Hydro or Solar ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offensive Threat Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 So what do think australians should invest in ? Hydro or Solar ? Whichever will provide the Gov guys the most kickbacks obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobble Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 Australians could use solar and tidal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted June 1, 2015 Author Share Posted June 1, 2015 See this is the problem , we as a species have to think globally. I know with out researching that Canada has vast water reserves and a lot more rivers than Aus that could be harnessed for hydro powered generators. A little research shows that Canada leads the world in hydro-electricity production , one source claiming over 90% of power produced in BC is hydro. It is very common knowledge that australia is the driest continent on this planet. It is also common knowledge that aus is a very sunny place So what do think australians should invest in ? Hydro or Solar ? I do think globally - so I am not the "problem". The "problem" is you still don't understand my reply and instead jump to conclusions. Obviously, if there's no source for hydro, then that isn't much of an option is it? Course, Australia is surrounded by ocean, so there's another option besides solar. But yes, Australia is lucky to have a "red" solar zone: See Canada on that map? Not the most efficient place to harness the sun's energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 I don't know - unfortunately, I've never been to Australia. My comment wasn't about what is more practical for different areas of the world - I was commenting on Hugor Hill's comment that he said solar was "cleaner than what we're using now". Since you have offered a rebuttal to my rebuttal, you do accept the fact that an argument is always opened to rebuttals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted June 1, 2015 Author Share Posted June 1, 2015 Since you have offered a rebuttal to my rebuttal, you do accept the fact that an argument is always opened to rebuttals. Yes, but I also answer mine, unlike some others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 I do think globally - so I am not the "problem". The "problem" is you still don't understand my reply and instead jump to conclusions. Obviously, if there's no source for hydro, then that isn't much of an option is it? Course, Australia is surrounded by ocean, so there's another option besides solar. But yes, Australia is lucky to have a "red" solar zone: See Canada on that map? Not the most efficient place to harness the sun's energy. I understand that you were/are being a smart arse. You are part of the problem when you post articles like the OP in this thread. Did I claim that canada should use solar ? No I did not. I actually pointed out that you guys lead the world in the production of hydro-electricity. Did I say that Solar was aus's only option , again no I did not , but with current technology it is the most viable. So australia is lucky to be the driest continent on the planet Your original post was meant to stir the pot , posting an article by some F-tard that tries to put solar power in a negative light. Then you act hurt when other members call you on the stupidity of the article you posted. Why do you wish to prove the validity of Marjanes statement ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 Yes, but I also answer mine, unlike some others. Thanks. That's all we needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 Whichever will provide the Gov guys the most kickbacks obviously. I don't think it matters whether it is solar or hydro those parasites will get their piece of the pie no matter what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted June 1, 2015 Author Share Posted June 1, 2015 I understand that you were/are being a smart arse. You are part of the problem when you post articles like the OP in this thread. Did I claim that canada should use solar ? No I did not. I actually pointed out that you guys lead the world in the production of hydro-electricity. Did I say that Solar was aus's only option , again no I did not , but with current technology it is the most viable. So australia is lucky to be the driest continent on the planet Your original post was meant to stir the pot , posting an article by some F-tard that tries to put solar power in a negative light. Then you act hurt when other members call you on the stupidity of the article you posted. Why do you wish to prove the validity of Marjanes statement ? You still didn't get it. Marjanes???? I posted it as I'm tired of the bleeding heart environmentalists and 1 sided viewpoints - so I posted the "other" side. Point is, no energy is completely without faults/impact. You've known me a long time, I'm not too sure what's going on with your tangents here. Edit: FYI - I started this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted June 1, 2015 Author Share Posted June 1, 2015 Thanks. That's all we needed. So are you going to answer my question or not? Let me refresh your memory: The original argument is subject to rebuttals, as with all arguments presented in all environments. And the official rebuttal is: it is still cleaner than what we are using now. Cleaner than Hydro? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 You still didn't get it. Marjanes???? I posted it as I'm tired of the bleeding heart environmentalists and 1 sided viewpoints - so I posted the "other" side. Point is, no energy is completely without faults/impact. You've known me a long time, I'm not too sure what's going on with your tangents here. Edit: FYI - I started this thread. Bleeding hearts enviromentalist's = people who actually give a frack about our planet and the people we share it with, and what sort of world we are going to pass on to future generations. The other side as you put it is some moron whose beliefs shall we say are somewhat retarded. What can one say about a species that spends a big chunk of it's resources on killing each other yet cannot find the resources to fix the obvious problems our species is facing ? You love to post lyrics up here are some for you All alone, or in two's, The ones who really love you Walk up and down outside the wall. Some hand in hand And some gathered together in bands. The bleeding hearts and artists Make their stand. And when they've given you their all Some stagger and fall, after all it's not easy Banging your heart against some mad bugger's wall......Roger Waters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 You still didn't get it. Marjanes???? I posted it as I'm tired of the bleeding heart environmentalists and 1 sided viewpoints - so I posted the "other" side. Point is, no energy is completely without faults/impact. You've known me a long time, I'm not too sure what's going on with your tangents here. Edit: FYI - I started this thread. Ugh, I know. How selfish are those douchebags trying to make a better future for their children. What a bunch of clowns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted June 1, 2015 Author Share Posted June 1, 2015 Ugh, I know. How selfish are those douchebags trying to make a better future for their children. What a bunch of clowns. The ones that do care yes - but not all of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted June 1, 2015 Author Share Posted June 1, 2015 Bleeding hearts enviromentalist's = people who actually give a frack about our planet and the people we share it with, and what sort of world we are going to pass on to future generations. The other side as you put it is some moron whose beliefs shall we say are somewhat retarded. What can one say about a species that spends a big chunk of it's resources on killing each other yet cannot find the resources to fix the obvious problems our species is facing ? You love to post lyrics up here are some for you All alone, or in two's, The ones who really love you Walk up and down outside the wall. Some hand in hand And some gathered together in bands. The bleeding hearts and artists Make their stand. And when they've given you their all Some stagger and fall, after all it's not easy Banging your heart against some mad bugger's wall......Roger Waters Yeah, good lyrics and you didn't have to post his name - one of my favourite bands. Like any group of people, a few bad apples paints the whole in a negative light - I'm sure you see what I mean now. FYI, I didn't mean all environmentalists - just the bad apples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offensive Threat Posted June 1, 2015 Share Posted June 1, 2015 I don't think it matters whether it is solar or hydro those parasites will get their piece of the pie no matter what. Hey, forget hydro and solar, Im all for nuclear power right now. The parasites can suck their kickbacks from multibillion dollar reactor projects. It works, New reactors are safe if they are out of earthquake/tsunami/tornado prone areas. Yes, they have waste to be dealt with but they work. 3 mile island and Chernobyl happened at a time when the entire place was run by computers that had 1/1000 th the computing power of the average smart phone. Fuel energy density (in megajoules per kilogram): Sugar: 19 Coal: 24 Gasoline: 46 Uranium: 72,000,000 One of these fuel sources is not like the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.