Doogie Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 To Edmonton: Eddie Lack, Kevin Bieksa (Hamhuis), Jensen/Higgins To Vancouver: 16th pick and 33rd selection Edmonton gets a great goalie which they desperately need, they get some help and leadership on the back-end as well as Jensen who played great in the finals for Utica. Vancouver gets a second round pick as well as mid first which makes up for no third or second. Vancouver can then use two of either the 33rd, 23, and 16th to move up in the draft; Barzal anyone? . Vancouver also sheds some much needed cap space. Do you think this would work? If not what could make it work ? P.S. I don't mind trading to a rival in order to make our team better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekey Pete Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 How does this make the team better? Picks are a straight gamble and we lose 2-3 roster players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirbs11 Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 To Edmonton: Eddie Lack, Kevin Bieksa (Hamhuis), Jensen/Higgins To Vancouver: 16th pick and 33rd selection Edmonton gets a great goalie which they desperately need, they get some help and leadership on the back-end as well as Jensen who played great in the finals for Utica. Vancouver gets a second round pick as well as mid first which makes up for no third or second. Vancouver can then use two of either the 33rd, 23, and 16th to move up in the draft; Barzal anyone? . Vancouver also sheds some much needed cap space. Do you think this would work? If not what could make it work ? P.S. I don't mind trading to a rival in order to make our team better. Lack, Bieksa, Jensen, 16 and 23 sounds like an Overpayment for Barzal and a 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 why would bieksa and hamhuis wave their ntc to go to edmonton....make it lack, kassian and jensen but even then i doubt they go for that...maybe lack for 33rd pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil B From The Pack Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 That's worse than my trade in that joke thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grape Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Oilers say no Canucks say no Hamhuis says no Bieksa says no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fateless Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 So you want to trade a starting goaltender, a top 4 defenceman, a 2nd/3rd liner, as well as two picks to get Barzal? How do you get through life with that brain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Never would work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyguy1234 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 So you want to trade a starting goaltender, a top 4 defenceman, a 2nd/3rd liner, as well as two picks to get Barzal? How do you get through life with that brain? Who's the starting goalie you're referring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintPatrick33 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Oilers seem to be in play for Talbot, once Talbot is traded then we will see the market for Lack open up. I seriously doubt though that a team will give up a first rounder for him, the goalie market is flooded with B type goalies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChickenDinner Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 I think this is a good proposal, Barzal is touted to be a 1st line center and everyone saying its a bad deal will likely eat there words in a few year. No way is it an overpayment Lack = 2nd Bieksa, Higgins, 23rd, 16th = Barzal Bieksa and Higgins would likely get us 2 3rds by themselves, and the 16th and 23rd would be needed to move up in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChickenDinner Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 So you want to trade a starting goaltender, a top 4 defenceman, a 2nd/3rd liner, as well as two picks to get Barzal? How do you get through life with that brain? Lmfao gtfo Bieksa is not a top 4 defenseman anymore he just has the salary of one, Higgins is useless now other then the pk which doesnt merit a 2nd liner, Jensen can't crack the NHL, how do you get through life by jumping to conclusions and making fun of others on a message board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 So play bad for 1st overall? Are we Buffalo now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NucksFanInOz Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 I would love to see a deal swung with the Jackets. To Columbus: Hamhuis, Bonino, Jensen and Cassels. To Vancouver: The 8th pick and Jenner. Argue among yourselves about this proposal, but this gives us a shot at Werenski or Provorov or maybe a real offensive threat like Course, Meier, or Rantanen. Boone Jenner would be a very nice addition to our center ice depth. He is and will be better than Bones as far as the two way game goes and is younger, but further along in development than Cassels and shows more upside. Still unsure about Jensen inclusion maybe in maybe out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 I would love to see a deal swung with the Jackets. To Columbus: Hamhuis, Bonino, Jensen and Cassels. To Vancouver: The 8th pick and Jenner. Argue among yourselves about this proposal, but this gives us a shot at Werenski or Provorov or maybe a real offensive threat like Course, Meier, or Rantanen. Boone Jenner would be a very nice addition to our center ice depth. He is and will be better than Bones as far as the two way game goes and is younger, but further along in development than Cassels and shows more upside. Still unsure about Jensen inclusion maybe in maybe out. Wrong. Cassels is not going anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 agreed cassels wont be going anywhere jenner is good tho id trade hamhuis vrbata and jensen for jenner and 8th draft rantanen then trade tanev and markstrom to sharks for 9th overal to draft werenski bonino and higgins for ryan pulock sedin sedin virtanen baertchi jenner rantanen kenins horvat kassian dorsett cassels/gaunce burrows vey edler pulock sbisa werenski clendenning bieska corrado lack miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.