Mr.DirtyDangles Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Absolutely moronic. 4on4 is perfect no need to change anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King_Canuckian Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Don't mind this at all. It is more of a viable team solution - where a creative and skilled group of 3 can outplay another group of 3, rather than a crapshoot skills competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 So... refs will put away the whistle? Anything goes? Outnumbered rush so throw a fourth guy out there without recourse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 So it's going to be 5 min and 3 on 3? I hate shootouts and I also hate loser points. I know there's Tv restrictions but IMO they should just play games through like the playoffs. OT hockey is spectacular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucksfollower1983 Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Would have been better if it was 5 minutes of 4-on-4, then 5 minutes of 3-on-3 and if still scoreless, then a shootout. was thinking a similar format but lose the shootout. 4 points for a reg. win 3 points for a 4v4 ot win 2 points for 3v3 ot win 1 point for tie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.