Blueberries Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 She/He did put Eklund in the title so you didn't have to click on it, well then again I'm sure you guys clicked just to point out Eklund isn't a true source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 It's Eklund season. One of those times of year when you open threads to find your dog took a dump on your pillow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnLocke Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing. He's disagreeing. Although Eklund's rumours aren't very accurate, they are accepted on CDC as a valid source. Therefore, OP did no wrong in posting this. Read #3. http://forum.canucks.com/forum-39/announcement-15-board-specific-rules/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanTSN Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Frolik would add more redundancy at high cost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I like eklund, not because he's ever right, but because it encourages hockey discussion and fun proposals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If we posted every Eklund rumour this board would be a crap storm. He has literally not reported anything that has come true before it has happened. There should be a specific sub rule about Eklund because lets face it he has about as much credibility as "some guy in a coffee shop" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I still don't take Eklund that seriously but ever since he got the Salo signing right I cant help but think there's a diamond in the bucket of crap he's giving us. I remember everyone laughing when he said Salo was going to TB and all of a sudden boom he was. I was shocked and the Garrison signing didn't make up for it at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If we posted every Eklund rumour this board would be a crap storm. He has literally not reported anything that has come true before it has happened. There should be a specific sub rule about Eklund because lets face it he has about as much credibility as "some guy in a coffee shop" Well actually, some guy in a coffee shop ended up telling us about the Virtanen pick and details about the draft last year lol. Surprisingly Eklund has gotten things right, like the Carter and Richards trades.... Still didnt think he was very credible but then he got the Salo signing right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If we posted every Eklund rumour this board would be a crap storm. He has literally not reported anything that has come true before it has happened. There should be a specific sub rule about Eklund because lets face it he has about as much credibility as "some guy in a coffee shop" Have you tried not clicking on the link? It seems your energy would be best wasted in other threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saucypass Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 At least Eklund is getting the Bieksa to SJS rumor right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Why did you even post this. EKLUND IS NOT A VALID SOURCE I don't like him but if other so called insiders that rarely call the trades correctly then why not allow this clown. Friedman dreger Mckenzie ect. No better or worse. TAke it for what's it worth these guys look at teams needs then make educated guesses. And say " what I'm hearing is" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmo2337 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Why did you even post this. EKLUND IS NOT A VALID SOURCE The "why" part.... is to generate discussion. Eklund is a valid source at this moment according to board rules. You never had to read it. So...onto the rumors ....and since he always gets them wrong I'll call it the other way I wonder how many I will get right? -Bieksa is not heading to sharks -the leafs *are* in a rush to move Kessel before the draft, but can't get anyone to take on his salary -Edmonton does not want Lucic, because they don't need him -The Devils, Sabres, Canes and Leafs may be be interested in ROR, but he's going to Dallas or Arizona -San Jose and Buffalo are not the front runners for Talbot, Edmonton is the front runner -who cares about Del Zotto -Ribiero will go back to the Preds -St Louis will keep Oshie, he's not going to Arizona -Craig Anderson isn't going to the Oilers. In fact, he isn't going anywhere. Instead Lehner will be moved. The least likely goalie to be moved is the ham-burglar, because everyone loves burgers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.