Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Brock Boeser | #6 | RW


thejazz97

Recommended Posts

Brock is still collecting points but does look a bit slow on the ice.  Brock still seems to be seeing the ice well though, so I don't imagine he'll take a big hit to his negotiating power.  I don't think it'll be a huge $ ask but, of course, I could be very wrong.  My guess is that Brock has shown enough since making the jump to the NHL to at least get Bo like money.  I would be surprised if Brock got much more than Bo.  No idea about term though.

Edited by EternalCanuckFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, EternalCanuckFan said:

Brock is still collecting points but does look a bit slow on the ice.  Brock still seems to be seeing the ice well though, so I don't imagine he'll take a big hit to his negotiating power.  I don't think it'll be a huge $ ask but, of course, I could be very wrong.  My guess is that Brock has shown enough since making the jump to the NHL to at least get Bo like money.  I would be surprised if Brock got much more than Bo.  No idea about term though.

Bridge deal of 2 years around 5/yr.  

Personally I'd like JB to sign Brock to an 8 year deal at about 6 per.  That would be a steal in a couple years.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say lock Brock (pun intended) for long term, 5-8 years 6 milion. The kid is young and got a natural nose for the net. If he spends the summer working hard on skating and conditioning along with some mobility training, i bet he can combine that wicked shot of his in full speed. It would raise his level of play tremendously. If he nails that id say he will definetly get even more multiple point games and goals playing with EP40.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BananaMash said:

I don't even know if I'd consider it a bounce back, just natural development. He's having an awfully good season statistically for somebody who is clearly experiencing a sophomore slump. He's also drastically improved his playmaking.

 

People might be a bit down on him sometimes, but I think it's more exciting.

Thats a good way to look at it. Still producing even this season really hasn't gone his way. What would his numbers look likeif he wasnt fighting it all season.

 

I think firing brown would do wonders for his development.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BananaMash said:

I don't even know if I'd consider it a bounce back, just natural development. He's having an awfully good season statistically for somebody who is clearly experiencing a sophomore slump. He's also drastically improved his playmaking.

 

People might be a bit down on him sometimes, but I think it's more exciting.

This year he seems to have a nagging wrist injury, he missed a big chunk of summer training recovering from a broken bone in his back, and it is his sophomore season. I would be surprised if he doesn't take a big step forward next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BananaMash said:

I don't even know if I'd consider it a bounce back, just natural development. He's having an awfully good season statistically for somebody who is clearly experiencing a sophomore slump. He's also drastically improved his playmaking.

 

People might be a bit down on him sometimes, but I think it's more exciting.

 

Not just sophomore slump, but also, back, groin, wrist injuries, no off season training, and that back injury definitely hampered his skating which was already a weakness. I see him putting close to 50 next year once he regains his mobility.

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Elias_Pettersson said:

 

Not just sophomore slump, but also, back, groin, wrist injuries, no off season training, and that back injury definitely hampered his skating which was already a weakness. I see him putting close to 50 next year once he regains his mobility.

In addition to the classic second year mistake of bulking up too much, which hurt his skating a lot in the first half of the season (along with the injury).

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could be wrong but i think the "sophmore slump" onus should be placed where it belongs. In their first years players are put in positions to succeed. In their second or Sophmore years they have a laundry list of skills asked by coaching and training staff to work on. i think brocks a prime example. First year was leaned on to fire pucks at the net from the half wall 5v5 and 1PP. During the summer months i bet he was asked to work on his legs and core so he wasn't getting pushed off pucks as easy. With his lower back injury, i believe he could really only focus on his upper body. Brock has been working on his 200' game all year. He retrieves pucks ,works  the boards, HIs passing and puck control at speed has improved remarkably. And still has that wicked wrister. I believe this 'Sophmore slump" issue is expected/accepted by management who are actually looking at year3 to see what they got. I believe Brock to be lights out next year just by how hes improved his other details of his game this year. Hutty this year is another prime example.Petterson is the anomally, hes improving everything all in game his first year.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2019 at 9:11 AM, Mackcanuck said:

It's not just Petey and Boeser, It is a tough time during a long hard season for a lot of players.

 

 

I miss the days of 80's and early 90's hockey. Elite players rarely had those kind of slumps. Steve Yzerman had 87 points with the 'Dead Wings' as a rookie. Teemu Selanne had 76 goals in his rookie season in Winnipeg.

 

It seems that whenever the Canucks have a rookie all-star, which is a rarity, he either gets hurt or goes through a terrible scoring swoon. It explains why the club has one of the worst rookie club records in history among the 'Original 21' teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/canucks-fans-irate-after-team-uses-fan-designed-boeser-logo-without-permission

 

Quote

Canucks fans irate after team uses fan-designed Boeser logo without permission

The Vancouver Canucks' fan community is calling a penalty on the club for using a fan-designed logo without permission from the artist.

Updated: March 13, 2019
 
 

The Vancouver Canucks’ online fan community is calling a penalty on the club, alleging the team is using a fan-designed logo on a piece of clothing without permission from the artist.

A recent Canucks TV video showed the club’s three star forwards — Brock Boeser, Elias Pettersson and Bo Horvat — collaborating with designers on custom New Era hats to sell in the team store.

hkn-avalanche-canucks-2018110252.jpg?quality=55&strip=all

Brock Boeser gets back on his skates during a game on Nov. 2, 2018, at Rogers Arena. DARRYL DYCK / THE CANADIAN PRESS

The hat designed by Boeser features the Canucks’ wordmark on the front and his “The Flow” logo on the side — an image designed by freelance illustrator and former Canucks Army blogger Gráinne Downey as a tribute to the all-star winger’s legendary hockey hair.

theflow.jpg?quality=55&strip=all

Gráinne Downey’s original T-shirt design. @wholegrainne

Downey and fellow Canucks Army contributor Cam Davie released the shirt online, with all proceeds going to charity. The design was a huge hit, raising $12,000 for the Make-A-Wish Foundation of B.C. and Yukon last year, and nearly $8,000 for the Canadian Cancer Society this year.

“Neither Gráinne nor I have kept one cent,” Davie said in a recent tweet.

Canucks spokesman Ben Brown said the club has reached out to Downey, but declined to comment further.

Boeser, who loves the design and the nickname, even bought one of the original shirts himself. And when it came time to design a Canucks hat, he pushed to incorporate “The Flow.”

“I think we should do Canucks, and then have that ‘Flow’ thing on the side,” Brock Boeser says during the design process. “We have my nickname, what the fans call me, ‘The Flow,’ that we want to put on the side.”

“There it is,” Boeser says in the clip, as a designer pulls up a slightly tweaked version of the image. “Put that right on the side of the hat.”

That’s precisely where the image ended up. But neither Downey nor Davie were contacted or offered any compensation or credit for their work prior to the release of the video.

In a tweet to the Canucks, Davie said he and Downey “would be honoured” to see the design on a hat, but stressed that Downey owns the design, and expressed disappointment that the team had chosen to use it without her say-so.

“I am disappointed that the Canucks and the Canucks Team Store did not make an attempt to contact Gráinne or me before attempting to use (and obviously change) the artwork that Gráinne designed,” Davie told Postmedia News. “I am also extremely grateful for the show of support on social media that we have both received for Gráinne’s exceptional work, and for our cause.

“Ultimately, my only goal is to raise as much money as possible for the Canadian Cancer Society through the online sales of our merchandise.”

Other fans rushed to Downey and Davie’s support online, criticizing the Canucks for what they feel is the brazen theft of an original design.

This wouldn’t be the Canucks’ first time borrowing contributions from the fan community to stock their team store. The club also recently began selling Canucks Army hats, trading on the popularity of the fan blog of the same name.

But no proceeds went to the blog, which has been steadily building their brand for over a decade.

 

Thoughts? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tre Mac said:

I can understand the desire to have the artist credited, but I wouldn't be irate about it. Hopefully the Canucks are smart enough to give him some credit and even some royalties from the sales.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On March 8, 2019 at 11:33 AM, Alflives said:

Bridge deal of 2 years around 5/yr.  

Personally I'd like JB to sign Brock to an 8 year deal at about 6 per.  That would be a steal in a couple years.  

Nylander is signed for 6.9 Million?????? This kid had 2 seasons with 61 points and 22 goals....

 

Using this contract Boser is a 70 point guy 30-34 G === 7.2 --- 7.9 million

Boser will never never sign bridge deal for 5 million x2... He will not play before he signs that? Vancouver need him..

If anything Vancouver might try a bridge deal 2 yrs  6.7 x 2 ---- I would rather sign him over 6 yrs x 7 million -- Think this deal will go on until September.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcam said:

Nylander is signed for 6.9 Million?????? This kid had 2 seasons with 61 points and 22 goals....

 

Using this contract Boser is a 70 point guy 30-34 G === 7.2 --- 7.9 million

Boser will never never sign bridge deal for 5 million x2... He will not play before he signs that? Vancouver need him..

If anything Vancouver might try a bridge deal 2 yrs  6.7 x 2 ---- I would rather sign him over 6 yrs x 7 million -- Think this deal will go on until September.

I understand the comparable contracts, but Nylander is grossly overpaid.  That's like saying that Loui Errikson gets 6 million, so Brock should get 50 million.  I do think we need to accept comparables, but they are not the only method to use.  

I agree with you that if we get Brock for 7 mil x 8 years that would be a fair deal.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pears said:

Wow

 

Yup, he’s going to get paid decently... Not too many guys in the league can put the puck in the net like him. I think him, his agent and management know a lot of his less than stellar play this season has been because of injuries and no off season training.

Also too much size added to his upper body since he couldn’t work his lower half. I’ve experienced the same when I played and it affects almost every part of your game. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Alflives said:

I understand the comparable contracts, but Nylander is grossly overpaid.  That's like saying that Loui Errikson gets 6 million, so Brock should get 50 million.  I do think we need to accept comparables, but they are not the only method to use.  

I agree with you that if we get Brock for 7 mil x 8 years that would be a fair deal.  

7/ year for 4 years

 

You heard it here first

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...