hatedkid666 Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Talbot was always getting more than lack. The GMs view him as a better goalie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfruits Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 a very late 2nd so pretty much 2 3rd still no guarantee Edmonton actually figures out how to play defense next season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Talbot was ahead of Lack on the depth chart. He fetch a late 2nd (57th) and late 3rd, we got a early 3rd (66th), people saying we got ripped off or Benning sucks really needs to calm down, it's really not that much more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Solid return for the Rangers. Should be interesting to see how he plays without the Rangers defense in front of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Chiarelli isnt wasting anytime cleaning up the oilspill.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 So....someone, anyone from the Lack thread want to pop in here and explain to us how Benning did everything he could again and that was a fair return and FAIR value for Lack. Because as of right now, Murray and Chiarelli look like they schooled him on how to trade a goaltender. ^^^^ This is how I picture Benning when he finds out how shoddy he did in the goalie market Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firestorm238 Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Talbot was ahead of Lack on the depth chart. He fetch a late 2nd (57th) and late 3rd, we got a early 3rd (66th), people saying we got ripped off or Benning sucks really needs to calm down, it's really not that much more Yes but why? Talbot posted worse numbers playing behind a better team. Canucks management needs to work on their PR and hype machine... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfruits Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 So....someone, anyone from the Lack thread want to pop in here and explain to us how Benning did everything he could again and that was a fair return and FAIR value for Lack. Because as of right now, Murray and Chiarelli look like they schooled him on how to trade a goaltender. ^^^^ This is how I picture Benning when he finds out how shoddy he did in the goalie market Lehner is younger by 4 years has played 4 more games and has similar stats to Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaSwede Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 I dont see Talbot being much better than Lack or better at that. However, it doesn't matter what I think, it matters what all the general managers in the NHL think. If they valued Lack higher, they would have offered more to get him. Bunch of cry babies in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanofvan Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Talbot is a better goalie, period. Rumour has it San Jose was offering a 1st so the return was always going to be higher than Lack's. It's a sight for sore eyes to see the whiners on CDC complain about player return like they have any clue what value is. Benning took the best offer than wouldn't bite the Canucks down the road, get over it. If he was offered a 1st or low 2nd, he would have taken it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfruits Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Talbot is a better goalie, period. Rumour has it San Jose was offering a 1st so the return was always going to be higher than Lack's. It's a sight for sore eyes to see the whiners on CDC complain about player return like they have any clue what value is. Benning took the best offer than wouldn't bite the Canucks down the road, get over it. If he was offered a 1st or low 2nd, he would have taken it. same people that pretend to be scouts they pretend to be gm's and it's sad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 I dont see Talbot being much better than Lack or better at that. Partly true I guess since being a Ranger instantly gives you more attention than a Canuck in the eyes of the media and, I am assuming, other GM's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Edmonton and Calgary are going to whip our old core next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Talbot was ahead of Lack on the depth chart. He fetch a late 2nd (57th) and late 3rd, we got a early 3rd (66th), people saying we got ripped off or Benning sucks really needs to calm down, it's really not that much more Uhh....really? Same comparable contract, age, height and weight, save % and GAA Remind us again how that is "ahead of someone" on the depth charts Cam Talbot: http://rangers.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8475660 Eddie Lack: http://canucks.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8475663 As well, and please remember Lack played on a far lesser team defensively and for overall skill than Talbot did with far more starts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 That oiler efence will destroy his career so its all good lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfruits Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Edmonton and Calgary are going to whip our old core next year so i guess the young players and prospects the Canucks have they won't continue to improve like they have they will miss the playoffs is that it? Edmonton looks shiny and new now wait til the season starts and they fall flat on their faces relying on players from better teams hoping they can repeat the same performance in Edmonton not realizing they still have a sub par defense forwards who won't back check and a revolving goalie door hoping the next goalie they sign or trade for will be the answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Lehner is younger by 4 years has played 4 more games and has similar stats to Lack We're speaking of Talbot vs Lack and the numbers aren't far off http://rangers.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8475660 http://canucks.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8475663 Benning got schooled. Any way you look at it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 so i guess the young players and prospects the Canucks have they won't continue to improve like they have they will miss the playoffs is that it? Edmonton looks shiny and new now wait til the season starts and they fall flat on their faces relying on players from better teams hoping they can repeat the same performance in Edmonton not realizing they still have a sub par defense forwards who won't back check and a revolving goalie door hoping the next goalie they sign or trade for will be the answer Reinhardt, Musil, Klefbom, Nurse all moving in this year plus Cam Talbot is already a vastly revamped defensive core and far better than what they iced last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Talbot is a better goalie, period. Rumour has it San Jose was offering a 1st so the return was always going to be higher than Lack's. It's a sight for sore eyes to see the whiners on CDC complain about player return like they have any clue what value is. Benning took the best offer than wouldn't bite the Canucks down the road, get over it. If he was offered a 1st or low 2nd, he would have taken it. Lets try this again Cam Talbot: http://rangers.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8475660 Eddie Lack: http://canucks.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8475663 Remind us how on earth Talbot is so much better than Lack when you factor in Talbot played behind a superstar NYR team and Lack played behind...Tortorella Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Do the Oilers even have the 57th? NHL.com shows that belonging to Washington Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.