lastprodigy Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 To Van: Mike Weaver Devante Smith-Pelley Andrew Ming 2016 5th 2017 4th To Mtl: Ludwig Blomstrand Brandon DeFazio Kent Huskiness 2016 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 Huskins is a Comet. Not our property. Other than that, I'd rather keep what we got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 Wth is this? First off, Weaver is an UFA. Beyond that, what's the point of this proposal except to get DSP (which Montreal wouldn't do for the return proposed). Also. Who the hell is Andrew Ming? Troll post all around Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimLahey Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 Maybe throw in Prab Rai's rights on our end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted July 5, 2015 Share Posted July 5, 2015 Maybe throw in Prab Rai's rights on our end. Was there a discount on scotch today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Schneider Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Damn, I thought this proposal would be To MTL: Brandon Prust To VAN: Zack Kassian 5th I was about to say I'm all in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Damn, I thought this proposal would be To MTL: Brandon Prust To VAN: Zack Kassian 5th I was about to say I'm all in. Bergevin says no unless we add a 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyhee Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 To Van: Mike Weaver Devante Smith-Pelley Andrew Ming 2016 5th 2017 4th To Mtl: Ludwig Blomstrand Brandon DeFazio Kent Huskiness 2016 4th This isn't serious, right? Vancouver gets a prospect (DSP,) comes out ahead on the draft picks and gets a couple of spare parts for an ECHL winger, an aging former NHL defenceman who would never make the Canadiens in the future and a free agent the Canucks won't be signing. So effectively the Canucks are getting DSP and a 5th rounder for nothing. Great way to do business if you can swing it, but why would Montreal go for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintPatrick33 Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Is this a makeup deal for us getting ripped off in the Kassian trade? Maybe the OP wanted to say: Smith-pelly 5th rounder for Kassian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.