JeremyCuddles Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 Well.. Markstrom passed through waivers at this time last year too. Not surprised. Pretty sure Marky Mark got sent down a lot earlier in the Pre Season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 Pretty sure Marky Mark got sent down a lot earlier in the Pre Season.yep after 1 untelevised game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 and what would the canucks do with him?continue placing him in Utica until we can dump Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 Clever. Except his name is Condon.condom? Oh ok....got it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 condom? Oh ok....got it .970 save percentage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 and what would the canucks do with him? Should be obvious by now, they would sign Tokarksi, trade Markstrom for a 4th and Miller for Hodgson and a 3rd duhhhh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 OH……. OHHHHHH MY GOSH!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 I bet the Bruins are regretting signing Gustavson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z Hockey Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 I bet the Bruins are regretting signing Gustavson[/quote No reason they can't still claim Tokarski. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 Islanders may take a waiver on him. Halak may not be ready to go so Tokarski would be a good option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 oil should grab him and corrado waive a fewmore bums of vets like ference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 oil should grab him and corrado waive a fewmore bums of vets like ference Oilers already have 3 average goalies, don't need another. Unless they move Scrivens, who already passed waivers I think, they aren't adding another question mark goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucktican Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 and what would the canucks do with him? trade Miller. Make Markstrom and Tokarski the ultimate goalie duo the Canucks have ever seen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven pounds soft Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 and what would the canucks do with him? Waive miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfstonker Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 Habs may want to keep and develop him but are taking a chance on waivers just like we did with Vey and Corrado. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFrame14 Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Problem with torkoski is his height. Too small to be a number one in the nhl and honestly when u have price, who cares who your backup is. If price geta hurt for an extended period habs are done regardless if its condon or toraski in net.. I was surprised by the move tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Problem with torkoski is his height. Too small to be a number one in the nhl and honestly when u have price, who cares who your backup is. If price geta hurt for an extended period habs are done regardless if its condon or toraski in net.. I was surprised by the move tho Too small to be a #1 in the NHL? are you high? Hes 12 lbs heavier and 1" smaller than Henrik Lundqvist, now if you're referring to the way he uses his size in net.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFrame14 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Too small to be a #1 in the NHL? are you high? Hes 12 lbs heavier and 1" smaller than Henrik Lundqvist, now if you're referring to the way he uses his size in net.... . I'm just basing that off of the games I've seen him play. He looks small in net. Goalies these days are all 6'3" or greater. Tokarski looks to small to me to be a nhl starter, obv Montreal felt the same way about some part of his game. Condon looks taller to me, makes stopping more pucks easier.. Edit: just looked. Tokarski is 5'11. That's short for a good nhl goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.