rizzuto&hatoum Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Projected out a couple years, you have to think that Gaglardi has the better chance of winning Lord Stanley's mug than Aquilini. Dallas has the better team now and with a few additions, they have a better chance at winning it all than the Nucks. Wouldn't that be ironic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersexual Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Most teams that were bottom feeders have a better chance at winning the cup than the nucks. Oilers, Sabres, Jets... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Projected out a couple years, you have to think that Gaglardi has the better chance of winning Lord Stanley's mug than Aquilini. Dallas has the better team now and with a few additions, they have a better chance at winning it all than the Nucks. Wouldn't that be ironic?It would be annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neversummer Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Insightful ... never thought about the connection but you're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Being close to winning a Cup isn't winning the cup. The Canucks have been "close" to winning the cup.Until they prove they can get through the likes of the Hawks, Kings, Ducks, and Blues, it means nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanTSN Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Game 7 of the finals is pretty close tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Projected out a couple years, you have to think that Gaglardi has the better chance of winning Lord Stanley's mug than Aquilini. Dallas has the better team now and with a few additions, they have a better chance at winning it all than the Nucks. Wouldn't that be ironic?Check it out, according to many, the Canucks aren't even supposed to compete. Yet here they are, basically stealing points out of games. They currently have a tendency to collapse in the third but that is correctable. They're still taking a point in Dallas. Those single point OT losses are the difference between the teams that make the playoffs and the teams that don't.It's only the second game with all the rookies in plus Gaunce, minus Prust and Hamhuis. In time, this team will dominate and I hope this is bumped so you can eat your words.Said with the best interest of the franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Which team has made more money? FA wins hands down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Game 7 of the finals is pretty close tho.his post clearly states he's projecting forward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanTSN Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 his post clearly states he's projecting forwardMine clearly refers to what Aquilini already did. Aquilini is the best owner the Canucks have ever had. He's ensuring the Canucks Sports & Entertainment continues to provide us with the best sports entertainment packages possible every season. He's got this team to the finals. He's given us the Comets. He's now bringing us an exciting mix of youth and experienced veterans that will no doubt bring us to a cup win in the future, so the fans will be happy.The owner of the Dallas Stars hasn't done anything yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Mine clearly refers to what Aquilini already did.tbh smart reply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanTSN Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 tbh smart replyNot really satisfied with it. I ninja edited it to be a bit more complete.Good luck to Gagliardi though. Dallas deserves a great franchise as much as we do. The league will be only stronger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaGuy Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 There's just no way a top heavy team like Dallas wins the cup. The game changes when the playoffs hit and it isn't the offensive dynamo's that come away with the W's. See San Jose, Vancouver, Washington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam126 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 There's just no way a top heavy team like Dallas wins the cup. The game changes when the playoffs hit and it isn't the offensive dynamo's that come away with the W's. See San Jose, Vancouver, Washington. If you're referring to the 2011 team then OK. But if you're talking about the team onward than I disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchoball Cannons Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 They sure have the support of the league judging how that game against them was called. Jamie Benn is able to do whatever he wants on the ice. No wonder he's wracking up the points. I haven't complained about the officiating yet this year, it's been pretty decent. That was obvious favoritism for Dallas, blatent penalties missed by Dallas, and they call ticky tacky crap against the Canucks, including two dives, one of them Dorsett just touches the guys stick and he jumps to the ice, Yet Benn can pick him while he's trying to defend the point and actually slash his stick away from the puck and get away with it and they tie the game? Ya I'd say the NHL has it's team out west they want to promote this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rounoush Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Dallas' weak D will hurt them like it always does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Close doesn't matter. You either win or you don't. Projections are meaningless and only give people ways to whinge about how the team isn't going the way they would run it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaGuy Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 If you're referring to the 2011 team then OK. But if you're talking about the team onward than I disagree. Yeah, I was referring to when we were an offensive dynamo. 2009-2012ish. Also the West Coast Express couldn't get it done once the playoffs hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I disagree %100 Canucks have a bbetter chance than the stars. You're saying this based on just a game tonight? That was settled in 3 on 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I disagree %100 Canucks have a bbetter chance than the stars. You're saying this based on just a game tonight? That was settled in 3 on 3? People really make too much out of one game.Had we won everyone would be talking about how well the rebuild is going and how close we are to being back on top.I don't take anything from 3 on 3. I would say these teams played pretty evenly during 60 minutes of regulation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.