86Viking Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Center depth on the cheap. Max Talbot is my suggestion Was on waivers so we could have had him for free. Talbot for conditional pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchoball Cannons Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Talbot hasn't been relevant since the 09 playoffs! 31 and can't keep a job on a dismal Bruins team, no thanks I'm sure Benning will do what every other GM in the league has done.....PASS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Goblin Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 No way! We didn't want him for free. So why would we pay for him? I'd much rather have someone currently in our organization to earn a spot our team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 3, 2015 Author Share Posted December 3, 2015 we need some help in the faceoff department, we are getting destroyed with the young guys down the middle this year. I dont think cracknell is fairing the best either. Talbot can pk as well. its a cheap stop gap, hes a ufa we arent losing anything really and trying to add some nhl experience at C would probably be a smart thing. Henrik is the only bonafied C we have, the rest have next to no nhl experience Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 3, 2015 Author Share Posted December 3, 2015 1 minute ago, Green Goblin said: No way! We didn't want him for free. So why would we pay for him? I'd much rather have someone currently in our organization to earn a spot our team. who? linden vey? not really the type of center we need right now. we have no other legit C depth in utica Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Goblin Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 3 hours ago, Yotes said: who? linden vey? not really the type of center we need right now. we have no other legit C depth in utica Rather have Vey than washed-up Talbot. I'm sure we could get a lot more for a conditional pick than Talbot. He is worse than Mike Richards. No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I agree, might as well throw Vey into the mix but this team desperately needs a veteran down the middle, Horvat is not coping at 2C. Find some cheap replacement because we could easily blow our season in another month and a half. These are the pressure situations where good GMs excel. Price is hurt, Bergevin assesses what he's got and knows they'll probably be fine. Sutter's hurt, JB needs to see that Horvat and McCann are too young to be a 2C and 3C, so lets see if he does anything about it. We're 2-4-4 without Sutter, and are only going to get worse in the next 6 weeks without him. At that pace we're worse than Edmonton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Kane Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Should of signed Roy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 3, 2015 Author Share Posted December 3, 2015 I guess with M.Richards past he wouldnt fit the type of player we would be after. But there wouldnt be any harm in offer him or anyone else a pto. Not sure what other C are currently unsigned And also, in regards to talbot, we could just send them an ahl player and not a conditional pick. I realize he isnt like he use to be just figured we could use some experience ance help at the C position thats all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HK Phooey Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 How about a conditional pick to the Canucks for Brendan Gaunce? On the condition that the conditional pick stays with Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 8 hours ago, HK Phooey said: How about a conditional pick to the Canucks for Brendan Gaunce? On the condition that the conditional pick stays with Vancouver. How about bringing Gaunce back up he can play center and is a big body with a good d-game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 3, 2015 Author Share Posted December 3, 2015 10 hours ago, HK Phooey said: How about a conditional pick to the Canucks for Brendan Gaunce? On the condition that the conditional pick stays with Vancouver. What does this have to do with anything I have said. Gaunce has been converted to wing, and he is banged up that is why he was not recalled. Great insight though thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal1 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 22 hours ago, Yotes said: Center depth on the cheap. Max Talbot is my suggestion Was on waivers so we could have had him for free. Talbot for conditional pick what a deal, a useless player for free! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.