Best wishes to Dan and the Hamhuis family

[RUPERTKBD]

On 12/11/2015 at 8:32 PM, VenitoHammer said:

My opinion was mine and perfectly fine,  the misunderstanding seemed to be that people took me thinking the turnover was hilarious (which it absolutely was) meant that I also thought that Hamhuis getting hit in the face with the puck was also hilarious (which I never stated) So thanks anyways for your input 

I can't really speak for anyone else, but the "misunderstanding" from what I can see is your categorization of Dan Hamhuis as a "terrible d-man".

Also, it was a bad giveaway, but "hilarious" is nowhere near the first adjective that comes to mind when watching that play, especially considering the ultimate outcome.

[hearditall]

8 hours ago, The Sedge said:

Read the comment again pal.  I'm not LOLing at Hamhuis' injury, just making a comparison of the reaction he had on the ice.  Not sure why this offends you so damn much. 

Comparing a MAN getting hit by a frozen solid puck flying a 100 miles per hour & breaking his jaw is NOT the same as:

(in your exact words) " Looked like a two year old throwing a tantrum though lol" .  

This completely explains that your IQ is lower than Hamhuis' # NUMBER.  

Now it makes sense...

 

 

[Dekey Pete]

14 hours ago, hearditall said:

Comparing a MAN getting hit by a frozen solid puck flying a 100 miles per hour & breaking his jaw is NOT the same as:

(in your exact words) " Looked like a two year old throwing a tantrum though lol" .  

This completely explains that your IQ is lower than Hamhuis' # NUMBER.  

Now it makes sense...

 

 

You've pulled that same quote out twice now, and it's not resonating any differently this time around.  I think maybe you read my first post with some sort of prejudice.  But, you know what?  He's okay, he's going to recover, and he's probably having a laugh about it himself.  

You're too sensitive.  

(personal attack on my IQ really solidified your point, bravo)