RRypien37 Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 8 minutes ago, Rainism said: PP specialist ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 40 shots 0 goals ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 0 PP points ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Yes. Great job reading the rest of the post too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 I'd rather see a Tanev Frustration thread. He's the only guy not on board with the direction Benning wants to take this team. Talk about a locker room cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tavrohorvat53 Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Weber in = guaranteed loss Weber has struggled big, and when he has been in the lineup the Canucks have too. He simply brings down not only his defensive partners play but the rest of the Canucks skaters play, with his play. If we're gonna be a team that rewards players based on merit then Weber needs to sit out for a few games. Other guys deserve a real chance to play and show us what they've got.Injuries or not. Is it really worth playing Weber, and disregarding his poor play, at the expense of the team and only because we want to raise his trade "value". And he really has no trade value! So while we're working so diligently to pump Webers tires before trade deadline, we are losing a great chance to really see what truly we have and what we truly need going forward. Knowing what we have and what we need will also help us plan for the trade deadline, the draft and free agency - in targeting and putting forth a plan for acquiring a certain player or type of player-- and we can be efficient and quick in our rebuild/retool or whatever. I really hope there's a forward-looking plan by management that not only worries with the present dealings, but also the future landscape of the NHL contracts and free agents 1-3 years down the road, to better forecast and prepare/plan for possible scenarios which will come up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainism Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 11 minutes ago, RRypien37 said: Yes. Great job reading the rest of the post too. I don't need to read the rest when you say he's a "powerplay specialist" lmao. Literally anybody could be playing on the point and still be better than him, I'd even use Jannik Hansen's slapshot over his. This guy does not deserve to be in the NHL at all, he just got carried by the Sedins last year and in 2011-12 by Plekanec and Pacioretty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RRypien37 Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 1 minute ago, Rainism said: I don't need to read the rest when you say he's a "powerplay specialist" lmao. Literally anybody could be playing on the point and still be better than him, I'd even use Jannik Hansen's slapshot over his. This guy does not deserve to be in the NHL at all, he just got carried by the Sedins last year and in 2011-12 by Plekanec and Pacioretty. You're not to bright are you? I specifically said he is a #7 guy. Shouldn't be in the line up unless absolutely necessary. We are in AGREEMENT that he sucks yet you continue on. Unfortunately, last year, he was considered a PP specialist. He did some how manage to score 11 times. Regardless, I am the last person that wants him in the line up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandre Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Weber is the only Canuck I intensely dislike. I feel he does the most damage to the Canucks cause with his play. I blame him for dragging his defensive patners down with him as well (Hamhuis and Bartkowski). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 anyone who defends weber should be repeatedly hit in the balls with an acme brick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandre Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 1 hour ago, Twilight Sparkle said: anyone who defends weber should be repeatedly hit in the balls with an acme brick Haha, sorry for laughing but this is too funny. But we are all fans here so I will suggest this instead - weber should be repeatedly hit in the balls with an acme brick each and every time he causes a turnover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samurai Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Pedan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nom_de_plume Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 3 hours ago, RRypien37 said: People need to remember he is a #7 guy at best. An occasional fill in and PP specialist. NOTHING more than that. Not his fault WD is set on putting him constantly in the line up and mostly in the top 4. He should be playing ONLY when injuries occur. Don't blame Weber, blame WD for playing him and JB for giving him an extension....and an overpaid one at that. This. The thread should be a WD Frustration thread, but we already have a couple versions.... Why Twitchy continues to use this ECHL level defender is beyond me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nom_de_plume Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 4 hours ago, DanHamhoose said: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like Weber? He is sucks Did you drink a Slurpee too fast? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nom_de_plume Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 2 hours ago, Twilight Sparkle said: anyone who defends weber should be repeatedly hit in the balls with an acme brick Or receive a healthy wood- swinging Prust Thrust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 2 minutes ago, nom_de_plume said: Did you drink a Slurpee too fast? thats how i am on 7 11 slurpee day XD 1 minute ago, nom_de_plume said: Or receive a healthy wood- swinging Prust Thrust i... wouldn't oppose a good prust thrust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nom_de_plume Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Just now, Twilight Sparkle said: thats how i am on 7 11 slurpee day XD i... wouldn't oppose a good prust thrust Lol, nice one. Is New Westminster the new Surrey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Just now, nom_de_plume said: Lol, nice one. Is New Westminster the new Surrey? there arent enough shootings to be surrey D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canorth Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 11 minutes ago, nom_de_plume said: Or receive a healthy wood- swinging Prust Thrust 8 minutes ago, Twilight Sparkle said: i... wouldn't oppose a good prust thrust Get a room you 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Just now, Canorth said: Get a room would yours work? i'm always open to more people ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canorth Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 13 minutes ago, Twilight Sparkle said: would yours work? i'm always open to more people ;D Let me run it by my wife Edit- she said no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nom_de_plume Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 25 minutes ago, Canorth said: Let me run it by my wife Edit- she said no *sigh* Mine too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.