Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Value of/proposal] Hamonic


Recommended Posts

Looking at Islanders, they have 6.1 million in cap space available.

Now, if Harmonic really wants out, what would be his value ? 

If we did something like this:

To Vancouver: Hamonic

To Islanders: Hamhuis ( 1.5 million retained), Sbisa, Baertschi

Is that a comparable deal ?

PS: I know its a right handed D for 2 left handed D but the argument is, there are plenty of right handed Ds available at this UFA, plus it leaves NYI with 2 million in capspace (accommodating Sbisa and Baertchi).

Thoughts ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was always thinking Hamhuis + Higgins + 2nd for Hamonic was pretty fair.

Hamonic is essentially a 25 year old, physical, shutdown defenceman playing top pairing minutes on a relatively deep NYI team which tells you how good he is. Doesn't bring much offence though which hurts his trade value, but he's EXACTLY what the Canucks need on the right side to complement their younger, puck moving defencemen (in paticular Hutton but also Bartkowski to some extent).

NYI want a top-4 defenceman back to replace Hamonic's minutes at the least.

That's why Hamhuis + Higgins + 2nd works perfectly. Hamhuis replaces Hamonic's minutes this season. Because of the age discrepency and the fact that Hamhuis is a UFA, we give a 2nd to replace future losses which I think is pretty fair for a 25 year old defenceman. Then throw in Higgins for the difference in value between an ageing Hamhuis and a prime Hamonic. The Islanders get current value in Hamhuis + Higgins for their Cup run and future value in the 2nd for what they lose in Hamonic's next few years.

 

To be honest I'd still be willing to wait until Hamhuis returns from injury (hopefully before the TD) and make the trade then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, canuckistani said:

Looking at Islanders, they have 6.1 million in cap space available.

Now, if Harmonic really wants out, what would be his value ? 

If we did something like this:

To Vancouver: Hamonic

To Islanders: Hamhuis ( 1.5 million retained), Sbisa, Baertschi

Is that a comparable deal ?

PS: I know its a right handed D for 2 left handed D but the argument is, there are plenty of right handed Ds available at this UFA, plus it leaves NYI with 2 million in capspace (accommodating Sbisa and Baertchi).

Thoughts ?

Quantity does not equal quality. Maybe Sbisa would work if we really added a top piece, but if they're already rumoured to have asked for Tanev plus a prospect like Horvat, Virtanen or Shinkaruk then the '+' for Sbisa would have to be sweetened a little more.

Also, the Isles have Leddy and DeHaan in their top four left side. They might look at a positive upgrade like Edler on that side, but aren't likely to just take on equal or depth players in comparison and clog that side up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To NYI

Hamhuis

Higgins

2nd

 

To VAN

Hamonic

 

 

It may seem like a little much but Haminoc is exactly the young D we need. Wouldnt mind rolling this D for a while

 

Edler Tanev

Hutton Hamonic

Sbisa Bartkowski 

Biega Weber

 

 

That top 4 would look real good. If i were Benning i would be on the phone with the Islanders. If the Hamhuis injury prevents it i would offer Sbisa+weber

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, McHortanen said:

To NYI

Hamhuis

Higgins

2nd

 

To VAN

Hamonic

 

 

It may seem like a little much but Haminoc is exactly the young D we need. Wouldnt mind rolling this D for a while

 

Edler Tanev

Hutton Hamonic

Sbisa Bartkowski 

Biega Weber

 

 

That top 4 would look real good. If i were Benning i would be on the phone with the Islanders. If the Hamhuis injury prevents it i would offer Sbisa+weber

2 inept UFA-to-be (included one that may have played his last NHL game) and a second round pick for an established young defenceman signed longterm at a good contract! That is so far from reality, it is a TOTAL waste of time to propose it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, coastal1 said:

2 inept UFA-to-be (included one that may have played his last NHL game) and a second round pick for an established young defenceman signed longterm at a good contract! That is so far from reality, it is a TOTAL worth of time to propose it.

Higgins would deffiently resign in his home town. And hamhuis will not retire lol. I dont believe that for a 2nd. And if it was an issue throw in Subban to make up for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, McHortanen said:

Higgins would deffiently resign in his home town. And hamhuis will not retire lol. I dont believe that for a 2nd. And if it was an issue throw in Subban to make up for it

Higgins is way past his usefulness, Hamhuis may not have a choice, and bottom line is, those two together represent a negative value in that their performance is far below their cap space. The Islanders are looking for a Nurse type return. So I say Tanev and Horvat to take advantage of the little value that Horvat still has. In another year or two, it may be too late to trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, coastal1 said:

Higgins is way past his usefulness, Hamhuis may not have a choice, and bottom line is, those two together represent a negative value in that their performance is far below their cap space. The Islanders are looking for a Nurse type return. So I say Tanev and Horvat to take advantage of the little value that Horvat still has. In another year or two, it may be too late to trade him.

U are insane. Horvat is a beast, little value? Im not even going to get into that. 

 

Do your research on sophomore slumps and then talk to me. A lot of great players have gone through it. Horvat is going to be a major reason for us winning our 1st cup. Just wait and see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, coastal1 said:

Higgins is way past his usefulness, Hamhuis may not have a choice, and bottom line is, those two together represent a negative value in that their performance is far below their cap space. The Islanders are looking for a Nurse type return. So I say Tanev and Horvat to take advantage of the little value that Horvat still has. In another year or two, it may be too late to trade him.

Are you serious? One bad year on an awful team and suddenly he's worthless? I think you'd be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, McHortanen said:

U are insane. Horvat is a beast, little value? Im not even going to get into that. 

 

Do your research on sophomore slumps and then talk to me. A lot of great players have gone through it. Horvat is going to be a major reason for us winning our 1st cup. Just wait and see

OK, we will wait and see. How long? Horvat a beast! 2 goals in 31 games, minus 14, which puts him #741 in the league in +/-. Some beast. Just to compare to another beast that has taken his team to the Cup, Toews had 24 goals in his first year, and in his sophomore slump, he only got 34. Horvat can't check and he can't score. I am not clear what kind of beast that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, cripplereh said:

instead of Hamhuis put Weber in there and add a 4th!

This is all so so so far from what will get a deal done. First of all, it has to include Tanev. Then you can discuss what to add and it can't be a reject because that actually is negative value (taken cap scpace).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PhillipBlunt said:

Or we could just strap Weber to a rocket ship and bid farewell. 

but what would that say about the GM that just signed him last summer. Or about the team president that just hired that GM the summer before? Don't you trust that they know more about hockey than you??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, coastal1 said:

but what would that say about the GM that just signed him last summer. Or about the team president that just hired that GM the summer before? Don't you trust that they know more about hockey than you??

It would say that they somehow managed to commandeer a rocket ship legally and that they were also able to circumvent federal laws in Canada pertaining to human rights and freedoms regarding high speed travel on the exterior of said rocket ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...