Boddy604 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 http://thecanuckway.com/2016/01/23/vancouver-canucks-c-brendan-sutter-raises-questions/ As this article states, just reassigning Vey and Zalewski won't be quite enough to put the Canucks under cap when Sutter and Sedin return. So it looks like roster size isn't the only barrier to getting both centre's back. If that's accurate, it's probably pretty safe to assume that Prust will be gone before the Canucks play Nashville on Tuesday, when Sutter is expected to return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 This isn't a report, it's Canucks talk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanisleryan Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Good problems to have I guess. I wonder if getting Sutter a short conditioning stint in Utica would be acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 EDIT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losing With Pride Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 REBUILD TIME! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, Losing With Pride said: REBUILD TIME! i thought that was, what we were doing...9 young guys on the roster ...a few more next year if they are ready... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyg43 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Boddy604 said: http://thecanuckway.com/2016/01/23/vancouver-canucks-c-brendan-sutter-raises-questions/ As this article states, just reassigning Vey and Zalewski won't be quite enough to put the Canucks under cap when Sutter and Sedin return. So it looks like roster size isn't the only barrier to getting both centre's back. If that's accurate, it's probably pretty safe to assume that Prust will be gone before the Canucks play Nashville on Tuesday, when Sutter is expected to return. thanks for update Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerox Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 The faster we get rid of Prust, the lesser the media will put their attention on us. Get it done Benning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Asset management trade him for something before we let him walk for nothing at the end of the season. Should be worth a 4th or a 5th to a playoff team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Prust, Hansen, Brisebois to TB for Koekkok and 2nd (or a 3rd). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Sloppy article. I hate how anybody and their dog can put up junk on a website and CDC calls it a report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 any "article" referring to sutter as "brendan" isn't worth reading. the internet has killed journalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniwaki Canuck Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 5 minutes ago, coryberg said: Sloppy article. I hate how anybody and their dog can put up junk on a website and CDC calls it a report. Yeah, I'm not totally convinced the claim about Sutter putting them over the cap is right. It all depends how they've handled the replacement players for Sutter's, Sbisa's and Hamhuis's long-term injuries under the cap. They may have accumulated some headroom while those guys were out. This is somewhat technical stuff, and the article doesn't really go into the details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losing With Pride Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 1 hour ago, smithers joe said: i thought that was, what we were doing...9 young guys on the roster ...a few more next year if they are ready... Full Rebuild! Blow up this team! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 7 minutes ago, Losing With Pride said: Full Rebuild! Blow up this team! that is a great mistake...jb is doing it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOgRook Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Fanuck said: Prust, Hansen, Brisebois to TB for Koekkok and 2nd (or a 3rd). Guy scores a hattrick and within an hour is in a trade proposal.. Only on CDC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boddy604 Posted January 23, 2016 Author Share Posted January 23, 2016 8 minutes ago, TheOgRook said: Guy scores a hattrick and within an hour is in a trade proposal.. Only on CDC No doubt lol. Hansen is probably the Canucks most versatile player. Can play any line, kills penalties, has speed, good defensively, scores goals, and the suggestion is trade him? Um... no. There's no return for Hansen that could provide everything he brings that another team would part with. Just because any team would take him doesn't mean Canucks should do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jock Cousteau Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 10 minutes ago, Boddy604 said: No doubt lol. Hansen is probably the Canucks most versatile player. Can play any line, kills penalties, has speed, good defensively, scores goals, and the suggestion is trade him? Um... no. There's no return for Hansen that could provide everything he brings that another team would part with. Just because any team would take him doesn't mean Canucks should do it. You have to give to get something, and Hansen is exactly the kind of player teams making a push like to add. If you can exchange him for some younger players with bigger upside and maybe a pick you do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boddy604 Posted January 23, 2016 Author Share Posted January 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, Jock Cousteau said: You have to give to get something, and Hansen is exactly the kind of player teams making a push like to add. If you can exchange him for some younger players with bigger upside and maybe a pick you do it. Hansen is 29. People act like he's in his last couple seasons. We've still got a few years of solid play out of him. He's a pretty complete player. The time will come to trade him but he fills a hole a prospect can't. Unless you're getting a McDavid back, you keep him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 48 minutes ago, TheOgRook said: Guy scores a hattrick and within an hour is in a trade proposal.. Only on CDC Arguably Canucks most consistent player for years and not declining any time soon. Definitely gotta get rid of him ASAP P.S. Hansen, if you read this, it was sarcasm. Please don't go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.