Mackcanuck Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 James Mirtle @mirtle 12m12 minutes ago Ducks put Clendening on waivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HC20.0 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 I kinda wonder if Benning will actually claim him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Claim him and take advantage of an NHL 14 glitch. The glitch I was referring too was that I got 5 late round picks from a team by trading Yannik Weber, claiming him from waivers the trading him to the same team, then the process repeated itself 4 more times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philthy Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 If he gets claimed thats 4 teams in 8 month's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Just shows Benning was right to trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 1 minute ago, smokes said: Just shows Benning was right to trade him. You could also say he was wrong to trade for him in the first place too though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliboy Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Been there, done that, no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, Aladeen said: You could also say he was wrong to trade for him in the first place too though. They were making a playoff push and the defence was hardly ever healthy at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstewboy Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 I can't imagine him putting forth any kind of real effort if we did claim him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 17 minutes ago, smokes said: They were making a playoff push and the defence was hardly ever healthy at the time. Ok then you could say he was wrong in forcing a playoff push with the roster he had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Still hilarious about how many people were upset about the 'loss' of Clendening when he was traded... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobart16 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 We need him in Utica. Not sure if it makes sense $$ wise. He is a definite upgrade on some of the PTO guys we have had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, Aladeen said: Ok then you could say he was wrong in forcing a playoff push with the roster he had. Meh I like the go as far as one can go theory, Especially in sports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Just now, smokes said: Meh I like the go as far as one can go theory, Especially in sports. Sure but not at the expense of promising young D prospects? Which is very much what we are lacking... So you are willing to trade all the picks/prospects until there is nothing left at a push for the playoff today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Just now, Aladeen said: Sure but not at the expense of promising young D prospects? Which is very much what we are lacking... So you are willing to trade all the picks/prospects until there is nothing left at a push for the playoff today? He still didn't pick a D until the second round anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 JB was reluctant to trade him, but had to, to get Sutter. I'd rather give him a chance any day, than seeing Weber again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Just now, smokes said: He still didn't pick a D until the second round anyways. What are you talking about? What does that have to do with Clendening? I am referencing the fact that he was traded for Gustav Forsling in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 5 minutes ago, hobart16 said: We need him in Utica. Not sure if it makes sense $$ wise. He is a definite upgrade on some of the PTO guys we have had. Not really. Subban's playing the role of OFD in Utica with arguably a higher skill set and ceiling. We could use a potential NHL top 4 RHD prepping in Utica on their top pair but that's not Clendening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 6 minutes ago, J.R. said: Still hilarious about how many people were upset about the 'loss' of Clendening when he was traded... They were fretting because of the loss of the next Karlsson in fifth-rounder Forsling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOgRook Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 8 minutes ago, J.R. said: Still hilarious about how many people were upset about the 'loss' of Clendening when he was traded... Almost like Trader Jim knows what he's doing ;p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.