Goku101 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Since we need good first line players who are young why don't we trade Gaunce, Zalewski, and a 1st in 2017 or 2018 for Huberdeau and a 3rd. I don't know how much Florida loves him, but 2 prospects and a pick is not bad for Huberdeau. If we aquire him we can make our first line stronger once the Sedins retire Huberdeau McCann Boeser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Vey Weber and a 2nd for McDavid and a 3rd. Not bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Ugg wrong section Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckGAME Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goku101 Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, Gstank29 said: Ugg wrong section What section is it supposed to be in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goku101 Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 Just now, CanuckGAME said: What's so bad about this trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, Goku101 said: What section is it supposed to be in Proposal/Armchair Gming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surtur Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 7 minutes ago, Goku101 said: What's so bad about this trade It never happened Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goku101 Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 Just now, surtur said: It never happened What's so bad about this PROPOSED trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RRypien37 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 1. You are proposing this trade so it is not speculation. You need to have "Proposal" in the title. 2. It has to go in the Proposals and Armchair GM'ing section. 3. We are in a rebuilding phase and won't be trading away the prospects we are currently developing or any draft picks - especially in this years draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Let's wait until the draft, and see where the Canucks will be drafting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goku101 Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 7 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Let's wait until the draft, and see where the Canucks will be drafting. If we give Florida a first rounder this year we would have lost the trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 26 minutes ago, Goku101 said: If we give Florida a first rounder this year we would have lost the trade I think you missed the point. If the Canucks win the lottery, or are in the top-5, we may get a chance to draft a highly skilled player. Which in that case, we wouldn't need to give away assets to acquire the same type of player, like you proposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SedinMadness Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 44 minutes ago, surtur said: It never happened and it will never happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Rule #1 -- YOU speculating doesn't count as a rumour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19Nazzy91 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 We won't need him once we get Matthews. Hey I can dream can't I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Is that you benning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 3 hours ago, Gstank29 said: Ugg wrong section I'm sorry you have to endure this kind of torture. My thoughts and prayers are with you. God bless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 3 hours ago, Goku101 said: Since we need good first line players who are young why don't we trade Gaunce, Zalewski, and a 1st in 2017 or 2018 for Huberdeau and a 3rd. I don't know how much Florida loves him, but 2 prospects and a pick is not bad for Huberdeau. If we aquire him we can make our first line stronger once the Sedins retire Huberdeau McCann Boeser Because Florida has enough prospects, why do they want more B rated prospects when they have a better asset? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NZ_Canuck Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 You need to explain why this would be a good trade and people might actually join the conversation. This seems like another NHL16 trade.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.