Daniel+Henrik2237 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 To NYI: Edler, Grenier To Van: Hamonic To Tampa: Mccann, Burrows(50 Percent Retained),2nd Round Pick To Van: Drouin, Cedric Paquette If we draft 5th: 1st:Jakob.C 2nd:Nathan Bastien 4th:Cole Candella 6th: Colby Sissons 7th: Griffin Luce No Off season Signings ..I doubt Benning will do anthing Resign Hamhuis 3 years Lineup without Jakob Sedin Sedin Drouin Baer Horvat Sutter Rodin Granlund Virtanen Etem Paquette Hansen/Dorsett Hutton Tanev Hamhuis Hamonic Sbisa Trymakin Biega Pedan Markstrom Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 to much for both trades when we could get more!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 I do agree that ...we wont sign any Big name UFA this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 14 hours ago, Daniel+Henrik2237 said: To NYI: Edler, Grenier To Van: Hamonic To Tampa: Mccann, Burrows(50 Percent Retained),2nd Round Pick To Van: Drouin, Cedric Paquette If we draft 5th: 1st:Jakob.C 2nd:Nathan Bastien 4th:Cole Candella 6th: Colby Sissons 7th: Griffin Luce No Off season Signings ..I doubt Benning will do anthing Resign Hamhuis 3 years Lineup without Jakob Sedin Sedin Drouin Baer Horvat Sutter Rodin Granlund Virtanen Etem Paquette Hansen/Dorsett Hutton Tanev Hamhuis Hamonic Sbisa Trymakin Biega Pedan Markstrom Miller I like both these trades. Adding Burr to McCann lowers McCann's value. I think you need to take Burr out. Considering Virtanen's off ice concerns, should we be looking at trading him instead of McCann? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Alflives said: I like both these trades. Adding Burr to McCann lowers McCann's value. I think you need to take Burr out. Considering Virtanen's off ice concerns, should we be looking at trading him instead of McCann? Virtanen has no off ice concerns. I can't believe this conspiracy theory has actually gained traction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Just now, Blue Jay 22 said: Virtanen has no off ice concerns. I can't believe this conspiracy theory has actually gained traction. We thought Kassian had no issues too. It's not a conspiracy. These are ligitimate concerns. Virtanen for Drouin straight up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 3 hours ago, Alflives said: We thought Kassian had no issues too. It's not a conspiracy. These are ligitimate concerns. Virtanen for Drouin straight up. Wait, wait wait........hold up.... You *claim* Virtanen has off the ice issues, compare him to Kassian for God knows what reason you came up with......then proceed to trade him.......for the player with the ACTUAL OFF ICE ISSUES with his team? I...I just.....I can't..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Blue Jay 22 said: Wait, wait wait........hold up.... You *claim* Virtanen has off the ice issues, compare him to Kassian for God knows what reason you came up with......then proceed to trade him.......for the player with the ACTUAL OFF ICE ISSUES with his team? I...I just.....I can't..... I don't know if Virtanen would be what Yzerman would want, but if it could be done, I would hope JB would consider it. The Sedins, and other vets aren't speaking out publicly for no reason. The saw Zack waist his talents, and maybe they see Jake follow a similar path? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 I believe WD didn't just throw dem rooks that he's been slowly building up all season in the dog house for no reason. Sounds like to me they got their party on enjoyed some party favors and showed up to morning skate still mentally floating a lil. WD ain't no slouch he's spent enough time coaching Jr's to know what's up. WD givith coosh mins and WD taketh away. No hate here kids will be kids but it's important for development that they get a dose of reprocussions for imaturity if their going to mature into professionals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 8 hours ago, Alflives said: I like both these trades. Adding Burr to McCann lowers McCann's value. I think you need to take Burr out. Considering Virtanen's off ice concerns, should we be looking at trading him instead of McCann? No way ..we resign Burrows anyways ..Doubt Virtanen has issues ..if he does ..give him a while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Just now, Patrick Jane said: No way ..we resign Burrows anyways ..Doubt Virtanen has issues ..if he does ..give him a while I bet you're right. I'm old and too curmudgeonly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 do we have a 2nd round pick this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.