-Vintage Canuck- Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 It has been almost two years, but it is still pretty interesting to look back in hindsight, if the Panthers had accepted the offer. It would have got us a true number one defenseman in Aaron Ekblad, or a number one centerman in Sam Reinhart. Elliotte Friedman believes the Canucks offer was: Lightning also tried to move up that year to get the first overall pick. In contrast, their offer was: There may have been some other teams also interested in acquiring that top pick. But in the end, the Panthers declined all the offers, and went ahead to take Ekblad with their first overall pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Not sure where that TB 1st pick was but looks like the Canucks would've been 2nd in that trade race. Don't blame JB for trying, don't blame FLA for walking away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Neilsons Towel Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 1 minute ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: It has been two years, but it is still pretty interesting look back in hindsight, if the Panthers had accepted the offer. It would have got us a true number one defenseman in Aaron Ekblad. Elliote Friedman believes the Canucks offer was: Wow. That definitely would have changed our franchise for the better. In hindsight, I would have offered way more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tystick Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 I can understand why they didn't take our offer lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surtur Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 3 minutes ago, Tystick said: I can understand why they didn't take our offer lol Would haven't better luck with Raymond Ballard and our second Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bissurnette Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 JB wasn't trying to get Ekblad he was going hard after Sam Reinhart. That said, yeah I understand why Florida would decline our offer. TB's offer was better but they were picking 19th overall which is probably why Tallon declined that offer. I would have heavily considered TB's offer tho, that's a very young future #1 goalie, a 1st line skill forward in need of guidance, and a 1st rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 the rumour I heard was Tanev + 1st + shinkaruk thats a pretty good offer. but for it to be truly realistic chance of getting ekblad, Bo would have had to have been involved. Tanev + Bo + shinkaruk ekblad will be a franchise d man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluralsight Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 I think if the Canucks managed to have gotten the 1st overall pick that year, they would have taken Sam Reinhart instead of Ekblad. I remembered Bob McKenzie mentioned this a couple of times during the TSN broadcast leading up to the Canucks taking Virtanen 6th overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tybarber Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 I also remember two rumors from that year: shinkaruk, plus 6th overall, plus 24th overall (so, shink+mccann+virtanen) I thought I also remember hearing, however, that the move was to get Reinhart, not Ekblad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 9 minutes ago, Wilbur said: Not sure where that TB 1st pick was but looks like the Canucks would've been 2nd in that trade race. Don't blame JB for trying, don't blame FLA for walking away. Vancouver had 6th and Tampa 19th. The quality of the players was certainly better on their end though. But this is basically what the rumour was (Shink and the 1st at least) - although it was also that we were after Reinhart instead of Ekblad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Yes, this was widely reported at the time, Tallon said he was open to offers but never ended up trading the 1st. It's believed JB wanted to take Sam Reinhart ( went 2nd to BUF) with the 1st, not Ekblad, maybe JB was just putting out false info that he wanted the 1C instead of the Stud 1D but that was the information circling around at that time. Tampa offer included their 1st which was the 19th overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Keep in mind that TB would probably be required to have a better offer being in the same division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiggs50 Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Canucks offer looks so weak compared to the Lightnings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tystick Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 19 minutes ago, surtur said: Would haven't better luck with Raymond Ballard and our second Oh of course, that package can buy anything you want . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 2 minutes ago, Jiggs50 said: Canucks offer looks so weak compared to the Lightnings. Not really when you're considering they were only trading down 5 spots instead of 18. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 I remember that year it was argued that there wasn't any exceptional talent, hence it wasn't clear who would go #1,2,3. Now looking at Ekblad and Reinhart, and even Bennett, this cream of this draft is looking much better than past drafts (Drouin, Yakupov, Murray, galchenyuk, RNH, huberdeau, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 I don't think Florida wanted to trade him.....even if we threw in some fluff or later round picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 38 minutes ago, Roger Neilson's Towel said: Wow. That definitely would have changed our franchise for the better. In hindsight, I would have offered way more. I recall Benning wanted Reinhart and not Eckblad from the reports I heard. Perhaps it would have been easier for Vancouver to trade with Buffalo? Buffalo probably would have taken the Canucks offer + another asset. Anyways Buffalo was probably thinking "were tanking for McDavid anyways". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z Hockey Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Everyone knew we tried to move up to 1st overall to get Sam Reinhart, Benning admitted it blatantly. The other package was Shinkaruk, 6th, & 24th. So glad we didn't do this trade, I'd rather have McCann, Virtanen, & Ma. Granlund than S.Reinhart or Ekblad. McCann alone could be as good a player as Sam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 21 minutes ago, Jiggs50 said: Canucks offer looks so weak compared to the Lightnings. Garrison had recent success in Florida at the time of the offer. Good that Benning didn't offer more though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.