JV77 Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 Just a general proposal for the Ducks. They have Fowler, Vatanen, and Lindholm who are all the same type of defenseman. Great skating and offense, but lack defensive ability and size. I think they should look to move 1 of of them. Would you do either for Tanev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHorvat Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 No because the Canucks were already lacking in defensive ability so why add to that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorevat Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 Brandon montour looks like a solid prospect, if anyone, target him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JV77 Posted April 28, 2016 Author Share Posted April 28, 2016 23 minutes ago, LordHorvat said: No because the Canucks were already lacking in defensive ability so why add to that? I would say we are lacking more an offensive puck moving d-man. Hutton is really our only one. One of them to go along side Tryamkin would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHorvat Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 11 minutes ago, JV77 said: I would say we are lacking more an offensive puck moving d-man. Hutton is really our only one. One of them to go along side Tryamkin would be great. Then maybe Vatanen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JV77 Posted April 28, 2016 Author Share Posted April 28, 2016 7 minutes ago, LordHorvat said: Then maybe Vatanen I just think the Ducks lack a well rounded defense, which is why they are failing at a cup run when they are stacked up front. Too many of the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Boudreau Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 I would offer Miller to ANA or SJ for Anderson or a 2nd round pick in this year's draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHorvat Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 Well realistically the Ducks probably can their coach first before deciding which players they want back. And they probably do re sign Vatanen. Benning won't trade Tanev. Defence is a bit of a puzzle right now depending on if Hamhuis situation and whether Canucks do actually pick Chychrun or Juolevi. So any decision on defencemen won't be addressed until after the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BI3KSA- Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 If the objective is to tan, then id do any of those for Tanman. If the objective is to win, we need more defensemen who can actually play defense, not less, so I wouldnt do Tanman for any of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BI3KSA- Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 1 hour ago, JV77 said: I just think the Ducks lack a well rounded defense, which is why they are failing at a cup run when they are stacked up front. Too many of the same thing. The Ducks have consistently proven that the only thing they are consistent at, is being inconsistent. To me that is their biggest reason for not winning the Nash series, and subsequently for being out of contention for a Cup. I'm starting to think their current core just wont get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 tanev for vatanen? hell yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelar Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 When Bieksa is on their first unit PP then the Ducks D needs work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 What is even the proposal? Tanev for Lindholm? Ducks say no Tanev for Fowler?: Ducks say no Tanev for Vatanen? Ducks say no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 The Ducks have a lot of Salary coming off the books. Miller for their 2nd rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 2 hours ago, Stelar said: When Bieksa is on their first unit PP then the Ducks D needs work. He's not. You don't even need to be educated on their D to know that he isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 21 minutes ago, Blue Jay 22 said: He's not. You don't even need to be educated on their D to know that he isn't. He was on their 2nd unit at least for a couple of games there and certainly game 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelar Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 39 minutes ago, Blue Jay 22 said: He's not. You don't even need to be educated on their D to know that he isn't. Well he had 4:02 minutes on the PP last night. More than Vatanen and Fowler. Only D with more was Lindholm. Saw him on the PP a lot last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 7 hours ago, Chip Kelly said: I would offer Miller to ANA or SJ for Anderson or a 2nd round pick in this year's draft. ... And 6 m off the books would keep us healthy... perhaps that extra cap space has the Canucks making a strong RFA pitch to Panthers D, Gudbranson,. Or inguiring about the St Louis situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 38 minutes ago, Stelar said: Well he had 4:02 minutes on the PP last night. More than Vatanen and Fowler. Only D with more was Lindholm. Saw him on the PP a lot last night. That's because BB was pissed off with the 1st unit. Bieksa is on the 2nd unit. So is Lindholm. And when Theodore was in the lineup, he took over Bieksa's place on the 2nd unit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelar Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, Blue Jay 22 said: That's because BB was pissed off with the 1st unit. Bieksa is on the 2nd unit. So is Lindholm. And when Theodore was in the lineup, he took over Bieksa's place on the 2nd unit. Thanks Mr Duck. I don't watch the Ducks as closely as you I guess. All I know is that in game 7 with the season on the line, Bieksa played 2nd most PP minutes for D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.