Warhippy Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 To hell with it. I wanna join in on the reactionary nonsense because I'm bored at work Trades centered around Ottawa and Carolina with picks being the prize. Vancouver: Edler Ottawa: 12th overall and bad contract At 12 van drafts Jost/Brown Vancouver: 5th overall Carolina: 13th, 19th and 48th overall. At 13th Van drafts Jost/Brown At 19th Van drafts Bean/Fabbro At 48th Van drafts Johansen/Dineen. Feel free to switch that up if you want in terms of who you'd draft Ok....flame away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 3 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Vancouver: 5th overall Carolina: 13th, 19th and 4th overall. Where did Carolina get the fourth overall pick from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 1, 2016 Author Share Posted May 1, 2016 Just now, -Vintage Canuck- said: Where did Carolina get the fourth overall pick from? Phone auto corrected the 48th to 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombieksa Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 Carolina deal is something I could see as a decent trade value-wise. With that said, Carolina has some great young D men in the pipeline and I think its time for them to mass pick forwards in the top 60 to try and fill a soon to be very young hockey team. For Vancouver we have a decent amount of young forwards who could fill middle 6 but need some top tier forwards and defense, so attempting to get any of those at 5th is more beneficial. With that said I wouldn't be apposed to trading down a few spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 I wouldn't mind that. Although instead of trading the 5th to move down, what about trying to package the 5th and 12th up to try and move back into the top 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 1, 2016 Author Share Posted May 1, 2016 16 minutes ago, Pears said: I wouldn't mind that. Although instead of trading the 5th to move down, what about trying to package the 5th and 12th up to try and move back into the top 3? Quality in quantity. We need skilled depth Jost is a stud Fabbro is a stud and bean as well With those picks we could replenish our D prospects for the next decade. As well...unlikely that Winnipeg or Columbus trades those picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 So 12th overall and Phaneuf for Edler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 1, 2016 Author Share Posted May 1, 2016 Nah They've a less productive contract that Dion in what's his name. Greening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweathog Posted May 2, 2016 Share Posted May 2, 2016 I like the Ottawa proposal, but I hope they don't trade the #5 pick. Imo the chance to draft Dubois/Tkachuk/Juolevi is too good to pass up. We need young high-end talent badly, and I believe taking BPA at #5 would be the best course of action for the Canucks. I really like the Ottawa proposal however. If Benning opts for Juolevi at #5 we could grab Logan Brown or Max Jones at #12. If the Canucks chooses a forward at #5 we could still likely get Bean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 2, 2016 Author Share Posted May 2, 2016 49 minutes ago, Sweathog said: I like the Ottawa proposal, but I hope they don't trade the #5 pick. Imo the chance to draft Dubois/Tkachuk/Juolevi is too good to pass up. We need young high-end talent badly, and I believe taking BPA at #5 would be the best course of action for the Canucks. I really like the Ottawa proposal however. If Benning opts for Juolevi at #5 we could grab Logan Brown or Max Jones at #12. If the Canucks chooses a forward at #5 we could still likely get Bean. Or Again. Jost/bean/Fabbro/Brown And the 48th too That's high end talent in spades Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z Hockey Posted May 2, 2016 Share Posted May 2, 2016 5 hours ago, Warhippy said: To hell with it. I wanna join in on the reactionary nonsense because I'm bored at work Trades centered around Ottawa and Carolina with picks being the prize. Vancouver: Edler Ottawa: 12th overall and bad contract At 12 van drafts Jost/Brown Vancouver: 5th overall Carolina: 13th, 19th and 48th overall. At 13th Van drafts Jost/Brown At 19th Van drafts Bean/Fabbro At 48th Van drafts Johansen/Dineen. Feel free to switch that up if you want in terms of who you'd draft Ok....flame away I like your draft choices with those picks. Really like them. But Edler is not worth a 12th overall, more so an 18th overall probably. Ottawa also is just adding a 5 Mil contract for a good pick, when they need to re-sign Hoffman, Chiasson, and Ceci. Hoffman & Ceci especially will be getting big raises. The Senators got their big 2-way D man for Karlsson to play with when they traded for Phaneuf. Edler would be redundant maybe, unless the Senators wanted crazy D depth and to have Karlssons Olympics D partner in Edler. Which is very plausible but they would not trade 12th overall for Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted May 2, 2016 Share Posted May 2, 2016 9 hours ago, Warhippy said: Nah They've a less productive contract that Dion in what's his name. Greening? All their bad contracts went to Toronto, Cowen, Greening and Michalek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 2, 2016 Author Share Posted May 2, 2016 4 minutes ago, Toews said: All their bad contracts went to Toronto, Cowen, Greening and Michalek. Damn....I did not know that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 2, 2016 Author Share Posted May 2, 2016 12 hours ago, Z Hockey said: I like your draft choices with those picks. Really like them. But Edler is not worth a 12th overall, more so an 18th overall probably. Ottawa also is just adding a 5 Mil contract for a good pick, when they need to re-sign Hoffman, Chiasson, and Ceci. Hoffman & Ceci especially will be getting big raises. The Senators got their big 2-way D man for Karlsson to play with when they traded for Phaneuf. Edler would be redundant maybe, unless the Senators wanted crazy D depth and to have Karlssons Olympics D partner in Edler. Which is very plausible but they would not trade 12th overall for Edler. Edler is still a 2-3 D man on almost any team in the league. With a decent cap hit no less and some term. I think he'd be worth a solid pick, that 12th is more than a comparable piece. Eating a contract in return obviously allows them to re-sign their RFA's to cap friendly bridge contracts or to facilitate another trade that sheds them some more cap. As was pointed out though, a lot of their bad contracts are now sitting in Toronto so it might be a moot point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 2, 2016 Author Share Posted May 2, 2016 Ya...see I am pretty sure I stand on top of the proposal heap here. It seems the more beneficial or realistic a proposal. The more likely it is to be buried and not argued about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 3, 2016 Author Share Posted May 3, 2016 Ya. I want Carolina's picks. I am digging Jost and Fabbro. If Ottawa's can be had too Bean us, Get the less sexy prospects with the higher potential to drive a team as a group Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.ed4ffd81393717a7b4296e6fdaac89fa.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.