swizzey Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Am I doing this right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrienzy Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Chychrun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AntiAquaman Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Well maybe add a leading question or option to get things rollingbut yes ya did start a thread. anywho.... I would use 63 as trade-bait with 5 to drop down and pick up multiple 1st/2nd round picks. Why?..... "stat-wise" only 30% of first rounders' become permanent NHL'ers so play the odds with 2 picks 7-20 or 1 at 7-20 and two 2nd rounder's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Perhaps this would be better suited in the Prospects section? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Some people just don't get jokes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB5 Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 63rd is where the team could swing for the fences, Have a look at some high risk and maybe high reward guys like Benson, Day or Sokolov. I say high risk for Benson because of injury, Day and Sokolov were at one time considered potential first round picks for this year but have dropped substantially but there may be something there worth trying to develop as a project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jono2009 Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 4 minutes ago, GarthButcher5 said: 63rd is where the team could swing for the fences, Have a look at some high risk and maybe high reward guys like Benson, Day or Sokolov. I say high risk for Benson because of injury, Day and Sokolov were at one time considered potential first round picks for this year but have dropped substantially but there may be something there worth trying to develop as a project. you think benson is going to drop that far? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB5 Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Just now, jono2009 said: you think benson is going to drop that far? No I don't but I wouldn't want the Canucks to take him in the second round. there would still be too many very good d-men at 33 and the Canucks should be looking at needs with that pick. If Benson does by chance make it to 63 then by all means snatch him up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 41 minutes ago, GarthButcher5 said: No I don't but I wouldn't want the Canucks to take him in the second round. there would still be too many very good d-men at 33 and the Canucks should be looking at needs with that pick. If Benson does by chance make it to 63 then by all means snatch him up. Its pretty much impossible for him to drop that far i feel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Sean Day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chon derry Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 lets trade it for a bean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Templeton Peck Posted May 3, 2016 Share Posted May 3, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.