The Canadian Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 People say my trades are pretty one sided so I tried to think of a fair trade for both sides. Here it is. TO MTL Burrows Subban Edler TO VAN Thrower Juulsen Positives Burrows is a Quebec native Subban gets to play with his brother Edler is a good defenseman Thrower and Juulsen are BC boys Montreal is not in rebuild mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsMillerTime Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 Positives why we are getting Thrower and Juulsen. They're BC boys. Who cares if were trading the best dman on the team. A guy with 4.5 million cap space and a promising defensemen in Subban. But hey its ok since they're BC boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top_Shelf Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 Imagine an all BC boys team in this case and then you would have a line up like this: Benn Johansen Virtanen Lucic Turris Lazar Ladd Reinhart Brouwer Kane Ferraro Connolly Weber Seabrook Stecher Barrie Dillon Hamhuis Juulsen Price Jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Canadian Posted May 14, 2016 Author Share Posted May 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, ItsMillerTime said: Positives why we are getting Thrower and Juulsen. They're BC boys. Who cares if were trading the best dman on the team. A guy with 4.5 million cap space and a promising defensemen in Subban. But hey its ok since they're BC boys. Subban is a long shot + Juulsen has a 7.5 rating on hockey's future + Thrower is supposed to be another Bieksa. The only thing I agree about with you is Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 I would rather see a Subban come this direction... Not that top D like Subban ever get traded... but if he did, some deal involving our 5th and Burrows + could actually be of interest. Montreal covets Dubois a lot apparently as a francophone possible top line player who adds some size to their lineup. Pretty much a perfect player for them if he pans out. Burrows is a way to even out the cap swap in the short term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 What does Montreal want? Scoring. Size and speed up front. Ready now. What does the OP offer? None of the above. Pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 There's this thing called the cap, & if it fits any GM's noggin too tightly, they get a bad headache - & then the league prescribes sh*tty medicine. So like, imagine every GM's hat size had to be 72~74(whatever measurement this is !?)..& you're adding like +10 to Bergevin's head..and so, then ..OH Forgettaboutit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 Saw title, expected Burrows to be traded, was not let down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 No one wants Burr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.