Nuxfanabroad Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Gonna list 2 deals that I just saw mentioned on HFBoards. The premise seems interesting(it's not so much about these two trades in particular, rather, the approach). Predicting many of the top teams, might deal 2 or 3 great, younger pieces to nab a high selection. With expansion coming, it makes sense to parlay some organizational-depth, for a top young star that you don't have to worry about protecting. examples: Pitt: Murray & Sprong to Cal: 6th overall pick Pitt: Murray & Pouliot, to Edm: 4th overall Curious what types of offers JB will receive for #5? Also how many contenders might opt for this expensive option? If you can think of any similar examples, pls have at'her... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted May 22, 2016 Author Share Posted May 22, 2016 ^Regarding the above..the Edm deal is likely shaky, as they have Talbot already. Calgary sure could use a 'tender though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampStatus Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 27 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Gonna list 2 deals that I just saw mentioned on HFBoards. The premise seems interesting(it's not so much about these two trades in particular, rather, the approach). Predicting many of the top teams, might deal 2 or 3 great, younger pieces to nab a high selection. With expansion coming, it makes sense to parlay some organizational-depth, for a top young star that you don't have to worry about protecting. examples: Pitt: Murray & Sprong to Cal: 6th overall pick Pitt: Murray & Pouliot, to Edm: 4th overall Curious what types of offers JB will receive for #5? Also how many contenders might opt for this expensive option? If you can think of any similar examples, pls have at'her... Over value Murray....... Same type of deal would have been given for Hammond last year. How would that have turned out after this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 7 minutes ago, ChampStatus said: Over value Murray....... Same type of deal would have been given for Hammond last year. How would that have turned out after this year? Murray was considered one of the top goaltending prospects well before this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bp79 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 38 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Gonna list 2 deals that I just saw mentioned on HFBoards. The premise seems interesting(it's not so much about these two trades in particular, rather, the approach). Predicting many of the top teams, might deal 2 or 3 great, younger pieces to nab a high selection. With expansion coming, it makes sense to parlay some organizational-depth, for a top young star that you don't have to worry about protecting. examples: Pitt: Murray & Sprong to Cal: 6th overall pick Pitt: Murray & Pouliot, to Edm: 4th overall Curious what types of offers JB will receive for #5? Also how many contenders might opt for this expensive option? If you can think of any similar examples, pls have at'her... i could be wrong but aren't sprong and murray protected? I know sprong is on his elc still making him exempt isn't murray as well? Besides i think they would rather trade fluery instead, or leave him unprotected also if fluery has a nmc he's exempt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 40 minutes ago, bp79 said: i could be wrong but aren't sprong and murray protected? I know sprong is on his elc still making him exempt isn't murray as well? Besides i think they would rather trade fluery instead, or leave him unprotected also if fluery has a nmc he's exempt NMCs need to be protected and will use up a spot on the protect list. Apparently only full NMCs though. The ones that prevent also a trade and not just a demotion to the AHL. According to CapFriendly, Fleury has a modified-NTC / NMC - so he wouldn't need to be on the protect list as it's not a full NMC. Murray would be in his 3rd year pro and would need protection to not be exposed. Sprong would be exempt if it's in June 2017. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bp79 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 18 minutes ago, mll said: NMCs need to be protected and will use up a spot on the protect list. Apparently only full NMCs though. The ones that prevent also a trade and not just a demotion to the AHL. According to CapFriendly, Fleury has a modified-NTC / NMC - so he wouldn't need to be on the protect list as it's not a full NMC. Murray would be in his 3rd year pro and would need protection to not be exposed. Sprong would be exempt if it's in June 2017. Thanks so would you keep Murray or fleury? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampStatus Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 1 hour ago, Toews said: Murray was considered one of the top goaltending prospects well before this run. still over valued even if he is considered top goalie prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 2 hours ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Gonna list 2 deals that I just saw mentioned on HFBoards. The premise seems interesting(it's not so much about these two trades in particular, rather, the approach). Predicting many of the top teams, might deal 2 or 3 great, younger pieces to nab a high selection. With expansion coming, it makes sense to parlay some organizational-depth, for a top young star that you don't have to worry about protecting. examples: Pitt: Murray & Sprong to Cal: 6th overall pick Pitt: Murray & Pouliot, to Edm: 4th overall Curious what types of offers JB will receive for #5? Also how many contenders might opt for this expensive option? If you can think of any similar examples, pls have at'her... Pitt will trade MAF. It saves them cap room to keep Murray. There have been rumors floating that Calgary is in BIG on MAF. I don't know what the return would be, but if it was the sixth over all, the Penguins would have to add. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.