Penskih Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Wow i'm so shocked. Very sad to be losing Mccann. He's so talented and has some pushback. I guess it makes sense with Horvat, Sedin, Sutter, Vey, Granlund etc.. I guess we'll see what Gudbranson brings but i'm pretty disappointed losing Mccann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noseforthenet Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 4 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Wait 2016 or 2017 2nd? Any confirmation? It's 2016.... I don't have a link, but Canucks posted it on Facebook. I like acquiring Gudbranson, but they got absolutely hosed here. McCann will be a top 6 centerman. Gudbranson seems to have reached any sort of potential he will hit. The 2nd we give Florida is high, but it's okay. I don't think we needed to give the 4th too. That was basically just giving it away. And we couldn't have given them Vey instead of the 4th rounder?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 I love it. This is exactly the type of guy this team has needed for years. Many D men dont get into their prime till their mid to late 20s. Hard nosed, tough as nails, can play big minutes. The kind of guy you want patrolling your blue line vs the big King and Duck oaf forwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Y'all should look at Willie Mitchell's twitter.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, Monteeun said: Of course it has more to do with the fact that the first example is more what you wanted which is why you praised it. Whatever plan Benning has, has proved successful in a sum total of zero NHL franchises. Don't speed up a rebuild. Draft. Draft. Draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curmudgeon Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 41 minutes ago, Jiggs50 said: Gudbranson is not worth all that. What joke. What a joke. I'm so pissed right now. McCann is gonna be a frackn stud. He just may be all that, but it was not going to be in Vancouver. For whatever reason, they made up their minds that McCann had more value as a trade chip than a roster player. You don't normally get a shot at a 6'5" 220 pound third overall draft pick who plays a tough, Pacific Division-type game. So he doesn't put up big offensive numbers. So what? He's a right hand shot who played 26 minutes a game in the 2016 playoffs. It would have been nice to have kept the second round pick, but there's a lot of time between now and the draft. Why do I get the feeling that Benning may not be done trading? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, Warhippy said: We had a former 3rd overall D man once Just saying Gudbranson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Barker just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, Remy said: So if you trust him to draft with that pick, why not trust him to trade it? Because his track record of trades is terrifying. Ownership really should be looking into shutting him down and bringing in a GM who doesn't give away picks like candy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Dammit...it IS the 2016 2nd and 4th.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grape Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 The only reason I'm alright with this trade is because IMO it tells us that Benning will be drafting Tkachuk/Dubois. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 41 minutes ago, The Weasel said: Don't forget the beast Tryamkin. :D The full point this poster made was ....Tanev, Hutton, Gudbranson....and don't forget Tryamkin! So in my opinion this begs the question who do we protect at the expansion draft? Edlers gone by the Trade Deadline...........if not way sooner! And don't count Hamhuis out of this mix yet, he played very well at the end of last season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FijianCanuck Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Gudbranson is a solid dman just don't expect him to be pronger. McCann needs to bulk up which is harder said then done. Also seeing tsn saying it's this drafts 2nd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selkirkcraig Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 1 minute ago, ScotianLifestyle said: Man, what a juicy trade. I really enjoy all you people taking a dump on Benning when he addresses our hugest need and yet all the pathetic complaining. Can't til the meltdown happens on draft day. nailed it brother. who has the best player as of right now? we may have given up potential talent, but we received the type of guy we need and can build around right now. this franchise needs to get talent on the ice immediately while still building for the future. this trade manages to balence those two needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, Monty said: Whatever plan Benning has, has proved successful in a sum total of zero NHL franchises. Don't speed up a rebuild. Draft. Draft. Draft. Burke, Nonis, Lowe, Tambellini, now Chiarelli... Ya they are all a testament to that. DO NOT pull the trigger early. Hard to build quality depth when you're picking from the table of everyone else and leaving a tip in the process. It's exactly why expansion draft teams do not win cups Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davathor Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 What is wrong with you people? Everyone OUTSIDE of Vancouver is calling this a fleecing by Vancouver, and I agree! Gudbranson is a BEAST. We're starting next season with TWO 6'5 D-MEN! Seriously stoked on how hard we just became to play against. We have the size we've been missing for a decade, and you build from the net out. Our goalie situation looks golden, our defence is finally exciting - and not the 'ohmygodwhatishedoing' excitement Edler has been dumping on us. Watch us either move up in the draft or pickup Stamkos. What a good trade. Cry more, babies - thank God you aren't GM's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackcanuck Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Canucks 2016 picks: VAN 1, VAN 3, NYI 5, VAN 6, VAN 7, CAR 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, Warhippy said: TSN, the same group that had Iginla going to Boston I am hoping it is a 2017....that's acceptable, but damn a 2016 is hard to lose with the draft being so close I mean Gudbranson is a good defenseman... BUT under our circumstances can we afford to give up that much youth? 2017 makes this trade better. 2016 idk. I am mixed about this trade. JB has more work to do if he wants us to be competitive again. Hopefully his moves and acquisitions work out next season otherwise . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucksfansince91 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 This secures Dubois as our pick. McCann was going back to the AHL in my eyes. I liked McCann a lot and felt like he had great potential, but was he a future top 6? It's hard to say because he's only 20. we get a D with potential top 4 and he's a big body and uses it well. He just needs to work this off season on foot speed. I'm assuming JB wanted a D with 2nd round pick which would have been Hajek or Johansson. It's high price to give up but we have a proven D that can step into the lineup vs a potential question mark. Dubois and Gudbranson. I'm okay with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumerman77 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Here is Gudbranson's dcorsi - he seems to have under-performed his deployment possession-wise defensively but over-performed his deployment possession-wise offensively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 2 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Gudbranson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Barker just saying. Just saying, up until Barkers 2nd year in Minni did he fall apart. Guy was solid. Chicago sold high on him. Seem...potentially familiar. You know, same guy who traded former 3rd overall Barker now traded former 3rd overall Gudbranson... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.