orcasgonewild Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 8 minutes ago, TheRick said: Also with McCann gone, does that mean the Canucks will re-sign Vey? PLZ GOD NOOOOOOO!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2009cupchamps Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Those of you who do not watch much Florida games. Gudbrandon is official our best defence man. Any if you who would rather keep McCann and a second round pick that are both unknowns are idiots. Benning killed with this one. Well done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassetgreg Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 1 hour ago, Yotes said: all i can say is could we not have kept our 2nd this year and sent them that conditional columbus 2nd round pick instead? You seriously think Florida would go for that? Canucks have been soft for years This guy isn't soft I like it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 If I'm the Canucks, maybe now I consider moving Edler? They can still fall back and re-sign Hamhuis. I don't think so personally > just asking the question... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derp... Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 14 minutes ago, SergioMomesso said: I hear ya. But let's be honest here. Where does McCann fit in next year or the year after? He's not a 4C guy and we can't roll into next year expecting Tryamkin to play big minutes when he can barely breath after a 50 second shift. 6'5 dmen who have played over 4 seasons before his 25th birthday don't grow on trees. “The way Michael Matheson played,” Rowe said, “really gave us more of a comfort level to do this. … We felt we had a little room to do this. But this was a very difficult decision. This wasn’t a quick decision. We talked about it internally for quite a while.” http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nhl/florida-panthers/article79967472.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
on the cycle Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, 2009cupchamps said: Those of you who do not watch much Florida games. Gudbrandon is official our best defence man. Any if you who would rather keep McCann and a second round pick that are both unknowns are idiots. Benning killed with this one. Well done I don't know much about him. Does he have much offence to him? or is he just really good defensively like Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6YPE Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 For all those who are complaining about this trade guess what? JB doesn't care what you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nergish Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 I said about a week ago that I knew with some certainty that McCann would eventually be dealt... he just didn't have much of a spot on this roster going forward... ...but I meant like 2-3 years from now... you know... when we actually have AN IDEA of who he is as a player. This is a teenager who played in the NHL and actually looked okay at times. His value was next to nothing because nobody even knows what his ceiling is yet. He got his toes wet last year and looked promising along the way. MAYBE Benning was right about Hunter Shinkaruk, but there is absolutely no way he knows something about Jared McCann that nobody else does... simply because it's way too early to say either way. Sure he was undersized, out-muscled, etc. a lot of the time, but everybody knew it was because he was a teenager... not because he's never going to mature physically. I considered him an A- prospect, something that isn't exactly a hot commodity, but something worth investing in. We just traded him when his value was next to nothing, so of course we had to add a 2nd round draft pick to get it done! The 2nd rounder bugs me. We were likely to take a Dman with 1st round talent who fell to 33rd. Gudbranson has incredible size and grit, something we weren't likely to get a 33rd, but we probably could have taken somebody with far better offensive capabilities. Gudbranson is a good player to target. Fits the rebuild in terms of age, highly touted prospect in his year, we're desperate for big, strong Dman, etc. but this is not a package for a guy that has been teetering on 'bust' status. Why not pay up a little bit more and go for a really big fish? I mean, of course the guy helps out D corps! How could he not? But he is simply not good enough to warrant giving up on a skilled offensive player and a really good defensive prospect in that 2nd round pick. I'm happy to have Erik on the team, but I hope to god this is not Benning's big move of the summer, because Gudbranson is not the answer. He's not even going to leapfrog Hutton on our D corps. He's our 3-4C. I guess Hamhuis ain't coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Players like this - 24 yr old, 20+ minute top 4 D that can handle the kind of hard minutes Gudbranson does - are bloody difficult to acquire in trades - let alone when you're not offering your best assets in return. Benning did this without touching Horvat, Virtanen, Boeser, Demko, Hutton, Tryamkin.... This is a move you have to make, no matter how much you might like Jared McCann. I happen to love McCann, but this doesn't hurt - because Gudbranson is going to combine with the likes of Tryamkin and Pedan and give this team a whole lot more heavy hockey than it's had in quite some time. Jacob Markstrom for one just sent GMJB a bottle of nectar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harvey Spector Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 1 hour ago, Qwags said: Am I the only one who likes the idea of having Tryamkin, Pedan, and Gudbranson all on the same team? Well I can tell you one guy that doesn't like it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 1 minute ago, Canuck Surfer said: If I'm the Canucks, maybe now I consider moving Edler? They can still fall back and re-sign Hamhuis. I don't think so personally > just asking the question... They certainly need to replace the pick. Maybe trade down and pick Logan Brown? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaerToBo Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 I love this trade other than the cap space were losing. It likely does not leave us with enough room to sign Stamkos. Yes i know i know it was unlikely but now we dont have a chance. Maybe we can move Edler and resign Hammer to save some space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 22 minutes ago, Ossi Vaananen said: Next year's forwards, even with McCann as an option: Sedin - Sedin - Hansen Baertschi - Horvat - Etem Virtanen - Sutter - Rodin Gaunce - Granlund - Dorsett Burrows (McCann) That's before signing a much needed UFA, from which we'll have the cash. Then you look at our future core of forwards with the 5th overall: Tkachuk/Dubois, Horvat, Virtanen, Baertschi, Boeser - that would fill in most of the top 6, with Gaunce/Granlund/Etem in the bottom 6. There wasn't room for Jared, either in next year's lineup or in the future core. McCann was pencilled in the lineup as per Benning. btw WD has pretty much already said that Baertschi-Horvat is a thing of the past. He prefers Horvat with defensive wingers. Etem is being asked to change his game to be more physical - he is not a top-6 player but more seen as an energy player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, on the cycle said: I don't know much about him. Does he have much offence to him? or is he just really good defensively like Tanev. Very different player than Tanev, Not much offence, but plays a physical shutdown role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2009cupchamps Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Just now, on the cycle said: I don't know much about him. Does he have much offence to him? or is he just really good defensively like Tanev. Untapped offence ability. Always put in the role of defence responsibility and finished in the ozone. He is way better than Tanev and hits like a truck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Columbus' 2nd round pick should soften things a little. I wonder if Benning knows it will be this years and that's why he was more willing to part with the 33rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chon derry Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 1 minute ago, Canuck Surfer said: If I'm the Canucks, maybe now I consider moving Edler? They can still fall back and re-sign Hamhuis. I don't think so personally > just asking the question... or fleece some team with our speedy ,quick d zone exit guy bartkowski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 A 24 year old 1st Round RD-man with over 300 games in the NHL. Ist d-an taken in the 2010 draft. Did I forget his size? Benning is changing the culture in Van and I'm lov'in it! Does this mean that Hanson or Pedan are on the move? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aspie Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 4 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Price aside, you gotta give credit to Benning for getting ahead of the rest of the league acquiring a D-man. This years free agency will be a feeding frenzy for a handful of good D-men. Makes you wonder what they're thinking about Edler right now. Honestly, I think this takes pressure off of Edler. He no longer needs to be top shutdown and 1st PK while trying to provide offence. Guddy would likely take more of those types of roles with Tanev allowing guys like Hutton and Edler to open the ice up more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckNORRIS4Cup Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Trade Edler and Sbisa for an offensive D(cough cough Subban) and sign Hamhuis for a discount home town price, the D would be set! Subban Tanev Hutton Gudbranson Hamhuis Tryamkin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.